Member Info for Luckybob23

Cheers for the reply Holly.

Just wanted to see if you would put any spin on it.
You did.

What it tells me is TWs latest article which was heavily focused on AZ dumping shares on us bulletin board mugs (nice chap)and not only that but hasnt told the market about it , is totally unfounded click bait thats easily explained away , perhaps the fact he didn't is very telling.

"Reply;
An investor (this is frequent for major shareholders/ holding companies) may have multi-custodians/ nominees to which the voting proxy is sent before the AGM.
In case one of them fails (for several reasons) the dispatch to the Registrar, it happens that an investor partially votes"

So AZs shares to some degree in custodian accounts.

That makes sense to me as an investor who is positive on syme.

What about you , being the on the opposite side of the fence?

Genuine question

I agree wolf , I don't report.

But what lex posted was against the rules and may have been deleted because of that rather than been reported.

Rule 5. G

Get moved to North Yorkshire poor.
Me, you , Steve and peak can have a 3p yacht party on my dragon pedalo.
Wooooo yeah

Alfred

Look into APOL.PL if thc oil and shrooms are your thing.
Its on aqueous though

In this case probably the former

Either free-trade aps or manipulation to bring so down and buy cheaper

Never let it be said extrader that you cannot make a mountain out of a molehill.
7/10 for effort
3/10 for execution

"Rather odd - let's see what the video shows :

Resolutions were carried on the basis of circa 10.4 billion votes in favour, or about 35% of total shares.
But
.."The Directors recommend that you vote in favour of the Resolutions as they intend to do so in respect of their aggregate beneficial holding of approximately 13,000,000,000 Ordinary Shares, representing approximately 42% per cent. of the total number of issued shares in the Company. "

I wonder who didn't vote...and why ?

'It's a mystery"

I can see how that would be really interesting for someone doing a study on fintech..
Oh no , hang on, I can't....

You are a mystery indeed.

Exactly, it was just a requirement for pre syme.
QnA was as informative as it could be.
Nice to see the faces. See they aren't all AZ with a mask on and SC didn't have a beard

."If the pilot deals were put in place in 2018, wouldn't they only just be coming to an end this year, as per the three year IM deal model?..

As peakhope has subsequently revealed, it doesn't look as though these were 'fully complete' pilots , ie they weren't funded as described (Euro 550m) , so it's unlikely that they met the other specification, of a 3 year revolving life.

Otherwise AZ would have said so, a.k.a. 'the jury's still out'."

The straw clutching has reached comedy levels now..
Not even trying to hide behind that mask anymore either.

Why would a pilot need to run 3 years to Prove the concept of inventory monetisation, true sale, blockchain tracking and digital token exchange?

What a very odd fellow you are.

I doubt it personally but we will see.

Twino , havoc, guitarman

https://www.lse.co.uk/profiles/rattyry/

FWIW think you were out of order going over there and posting like you did but at least the bell end has gone.

"This is the good stuff"

Yeah nice to see an interview with someone that understands but more so has an interest in the sector.
The interviewer seemed a lot more switched on .

AZ as usual looking like he just stepped out of a salon.
:-)

Herbie, what a load of rubbish.

There's a massive difference between lying and the market shrinking due to vaccines.

As for "need a bigger boat" its far more likely that the ramoers who ride the spike and disappeared were sending fake emails expressing interest to DR cave than it Dr Cave lying about it, after all he's not it in for the money but the science and the good of man.

Cheers peak , same to you for your post.

Its a strange world we live in ey.

Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day, teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime.

Put a man on LSE behind a wall of anonymity and gawd knows how he will behave..

"Can you tell me why is the share price 30% down now since first rns if it was only a market overreaction? Come up with something other than what az stated (market overreaction) and it will be considered false if that is what youre about"

We all know why the SP dropped abs.
Its simple, progress not meeting expectations.
Traders selling out or holders losing patience, you can add in to that a certain percentage of stop losses and weak minds targeted by the "weak RNS crews" that lurk on LSE and appear on any board with a weak RNS to exploit the situation.
The fact az said it was an overreaction is down to him knowing exactly what is going on behind the curtains as opposed to us PIs who can only either believe or disbelieve what we are told is happening .

I think your making a big deal out of the statement regarding overreaction.
The "cracking RNS" is just a sound bite, we will get news on various fronts when its ready and until then we will trade sideways with daily ups and downs to give market makers their cut.

This board is no different to any other penny stock apart from weve suffered far more attacks from people wishing to see those of us who weighed up the risk and invested early fail, not because they care about investors but because they are either twisted or will gain financially from the company fail. Look across LSE, its full of those types.
If you want to try and target holders here for reacting the way they do and make out they are somehow sinister then I suggest you invest in something and spend a year listening to drunken hack journalists writing erroneous articles and setting up fake websites and have their fan boys turn up regurgitating the same waffle just because they paid to read such nonsense, see how that makes you react .
You target Parm calling him element because he sometimes spits out insults , but Parm's always tried to put a lid on the crazy rampers and it was Parm who spent his time emailing syme and the FCA while we were in suspension, looking for answers and trying to calm the nerves of some seriously worried investors , meanwhile the real "elements" were whooping around on here spreading fear and telling everyone AZ had run off with our money and we had all gone bust and TW and his fan boys boasting about it and how the FCA will shut us down.
When what actually happened was the FCA looked at the situation and allowed us to get back to trading.
So you tell me who the "elements" are, because so far you've been doing a pretty good impression of one.

You remembered your log in details then..

With your credibility i would if just set up a new profile then

Market seems to like the rns

Yup