We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
Thanks burnley !
I hope your doing good too fella.
The reason their all locked down is because certain people have done a very good job at creating an element of paranoia to make sure people are scared.
Classics scam tactic psychology
Along with propaganda and misinformation to create fear and confusion.
No Steady, but If people are going to suggest BPM would provide a credit line, its just useful to understand how much in terms of WL IMs need to happen to make that a viable option.
The idea is to launch WL across more regions and multiple banks.. but I dont imagine they're just going to go from one WL event to 100 without analysing the whole transaction from start to finish, so how longs that first event going to take to pay the client their monetization finds, to them paying it back so all that data can be scrutised and other banks can say YES like the man from delmonte
We've speculated about it before but not sure if that's a fact .
If anyone has an rns or interview in which that's said it would be appreciated 👏
It would be helpful if we knew details.
How much is the bank making from loaning the money to the stock company who are funding the WL
How much are we making percentage wise per transaction?
Don't see how they can do a public raise.
Who'd soak that up?
The only volume is that of whomever is trading it.
As for takeovers.. should be the last thing shareholders want to happen given our struggle to fund anything significant. We'd get less than it is now.
Why would you want a takeover?
Well Steve, I appreciate it and again, I'm sorry for your loss.
You are correct peak.
And I wholeheartedly apologise for doing so.
Sometimes I need to pull my head out of my arsè
So what your saying is its OK for savvy to tell a bunch of strangers on a public forum to use in his argument.. but it's not OK for anyone to mention it after that?
OK. Got it.
What you're doing is using double standards .
Well Steve.. Maybe you should of piped up when savvy brought it up then , putting that information in public domain without the facts.
But in future I won't mention it and I apologise for repeating any part of it.
For the record, what I think is inappropriate is someone coming on here and telling people who've been here since the start that hardly anyone has an average of 0.5 and if they do its their own fault for not averaging down .
Steve, just repeating what was posted by another poster. Since I'm not on telegram I don't know who it is.
If its true, how is that inappropriate BTW ?
Its either a fact or its not.
I was just arguing long term holds are not a good idea for penny stocks. 5 years is what I'd consider long term .
But you are correct of course, timing is key, I just picked those because they were on your list.
Obviously lots of people recently made good money on HE1 for example, similarly I did the same on val and arb a few years back.
Val is a great example of the seed investors getting shafted . While ARB is a great example of seed investors getting a multibag if they held long enough, though I'm sure many invested off the rise and will never see their money back.
Not sure your strategy holds up Optimist
FAB .. 6month ..-29% 5yr.. -86%
BRH ..6m... -35% 5yr.. - 16%
AMGO..6m.. -73% 5yr.. -99.92%
HE1... 6m.. -67% 5yr.. -49%
RCGH . 6m. -84%
HZM.. 6m. -97% 5yr.. -93%
Pick 100 penny stocks, you'd struggle to find 5 of them up Iver a long hold.
You believe what ever you like fella.
Meanwhile people have died waiting for AZ to fulfill his promises.
Averaging down didnt help them did it.
"Not so Lucky then Bob.You obviously bought too early.Never mind."
Well I bought when we were weeks from monetizing 300m
And as far as luck goes.. lucky enough that all my money in here came from profits elsewhere and still had enough to buy my house outright..
2000%
Which I the opposite of holding it down
Anyone can look at the trades and see lots of silly little buys at .38
Those are holding it up so they can sell 15m shares at .3