RE: Raise RNS Monday?19 Jan 2025 09:36
Imagine holding a ten-bagger; who wouldn't want that? I've followed this company for five years, and I understand that in the event of a merger or acquisition, a share price of £20 would be undervalued if investors miss out on the immense future potential. The trade-off should fully reflect this full potential. But, it’s difficult to set the time and value, right?
As long as Bex hasn't lost its potential for future approval, a share price of £5 could be justified during this "waiting period", as well as 2£ (when waiting for financing). Achieving (jumping up to) a share price of £20 would be a game-changer and a good start, right?
Progress in clinical trials is always desired. At some point there comes the point of decision: a go, no-go, or how to go. Anyway we have a business case, right? Or do we only have a fairytale "The Emperor's New Clothes" or really a "nominee" among those poised for significant breakthroughs. A new cornerstone? Aren’t we talking about something like that? Right?
So why wouldn't a big pharmaceutical company just buy in, instead of pouring money into their other early-stage R&D to nurture multiple ideas, hoping to discover something akin to Bex?
Some big pharma companies may get a sense of direction much earlier than others, who might still be waiting for more explicit milestones. You never know what triggers might prompt big pharma to make a move before official clinical milestones are reached, right? …or do we need just a little bit of more data, right?
If the sentiment is geared towards finding the next big thing, the market leans towards mergers and acquisitions, I suppose, rather than partnerships, especially when considering enormous opportunities. At least Faron now boasts a robust clinical setup and relatively clear biomarkers, right?
Ultimately, the outcome isn't dictated by whether onlookers are optimistic or pessimistic. The stark reality is that it's the doers' attitude and the financial backing that determine success—if it's feasible, right? Right as far as there wasn’t any competition. I sense that the momentum is about now and as time slips away the risks being left among the « once so promising stars » increase. There is no one to blame if other mechanisms take a win. But it’s not easy for the other mechanisms to prove to be better choices. A choice is a human decision. IMO