Member Info for Louis10

There's no rush now. The production they bought ensures the funds are always there to pay their salaries.

That's the problem: you think only bullish comments are allowed.

What's tiring is being constantly insulted by a handful of people on this board who constantly tout the stock.

And you've all been wrong - all the way down.

Jim's not here, Tony. I think you'll find him on Twitter.

And stop stalking me around the boards.

I just comment on what's happening. If you want to pretend it's something else, that's up to you, but don't keep misleading people, Brian.

Not exactly, Brian. It's share price has collapsed.

Hardly the sharpest tool in the box, are you.

Who pays him?

No one denies the accuracy of anything that Jim says here.

Exactly, cricket, it all now hinges on muttering about data rooms and potential partners. Operations appear to have failed.

You guys are seriously deluded if you think engaging one particular contractor guarantees success.

And you've got Google too.

Enjoy your losses, iceberg.

Scot never stops trying to flog that old dead horse, PANR.

Which merchant bank was he with?

Hi Flombo. Oilman Jim explains it all in his Easter blog. The link is on the PRD board.

There's no comeback on SLB, iceberg. Plenty of the projects they're involved in fail. That's the nature of the industry.

You're kidding yourself and others by making out that SLB's involvement is some kind of guarantee of success.

Simply stating the facts, investor111. You're deluding yourself otherwise.

SLB work for anyone who pays them. They make no value judgment on the merits of the project. Their reputation is not on the line. They're a service provider.

Exactly, Brombarb, PANR is just another paying client. There's no endorsement of the project by SLB.

https://oilman.substack.com/p/easter-blog-9-april-2023

Serial winner