Member Info for LONGWAIT

I can't even buy a small bundle!

'The market are unable to offer an electronic quote, therefore please place a limit order...'

' I am the only person here actually giving a constructive opinion about the company. The rest of you guys, for whatever reason just want to talk about me.
Now that is creepy!'

(TheShen)

You have never given a constructive opinion about the company - only destructive.
You say it has no future, that it is a 't**d', that investors in it are idiots, that you would never invest in it but would short it, and if anyone posts a constructive comment about it, you shoot it down and ridicule him and if he objects, you make spiteful remarks about his hurt feelings.

We don't want to talk about you; we just want you to go away because you're the one who is creepy.

TheShen doesn't like the 'usual dummy gibberish that seems to be commonplace on this board.'

It was a much better board before he arrived and polluted it with his cheap insults and his lies - such as accusing me of promoting the shares in order to try to cover my losses - and then called me a liar for daring to tell the truth about him, calling me Hitler for daring to report him.

Of course, Cephalo, 'There's something sinister about TheShen'.
Why would someone post comments about a company, calling it a 'turd,' calling investors in it 'idiots and clowns,' talking about opportunities to short its stock (having already admitted to having shorted LOGP), and declaring that he has never owned shares in it?

Of course, his purpose in being here is to demoralise investors and spread panic.

That is why 'The poor souls here are sick of hearing ... from [TheShen].'

That is why he needs to be removed.

I agree with you, Ivan, but most people think there is something wrong with PMO because its share price is so low.

That is one of the reasons most people buy too high.

If the share price were high, they might be prepared to buy.

Sorry; that has been pointed out to me before and I do take it into account each time I buy more shares, because of stamp duty.

However, I have so many holdings in AIM penny shares - that are also covered on LSE - that I really can't see the difference.

Based on my experience, Bob, what you describe is typical of AIM shares in general.

'You are right LONGWAIT, exploration upside is the part I am studiously ignoring. It could come good, by a miracle.'

(ps2...)

One miracle at a time, PS!

The first miracle is first gas...

I agree that no one can put a figure on it.

The company is saying that there is 'huge exploration upside', which suggests that it thinks the share price could become something more than a single figure.

That's an interesting story, Poods.

When I look at the Google chart, it shows a loss over the last eight years.
The return over ten years is, presumably, also a loss.

I cannot believe the chart for your 100-bagger was anything like that.

'Longwait If you bother to scroll back a few threads you will see a reference made by the shen refering to interest of share capital which Could be a reference to various ways of a company aquring funds one of such could be a Rights issue which i believe will be the case for pvr.'

(ranger4)

I don't need to 'bother', as you condescendingly put it, because as you know, I had already had the dubious pleasure of reading through his posted comments on the page I cited.

What he actually wrote is:

'I am guessing that the next RNS will be a notification of interest in share capital.

Could be this week or next.

Will the desperate dreamers still believe if they are notified that SpotOn have liquidated their 3%? Imagine finding out you bought those shares. Doh!

Will Alan Linn stake his reputation that everything is hunky dory?'

29 Mar 2021 18:58

He was predicting that the share register would indicate that SpotOn had sold its shareholding in PVR.

It is quite obvious that he was not predicting a rights issue.

You wrote,

'The shen mentioned capital raise in a previous post'

Will you identify the post?

Could you please tell us which post?

His posted comments are collected under his name at:

https://www.lse.co.uk/profiles/theshen/

I'm not sure I should be replying to you, as you should have been banned by now by the administrators of LSE.

You ask, 'Didn't you recommend buying shares at 6p recently Longwait?'

No - I did not and if I had, you would have quoted the posted comment, with my name and timestamp, instead of asking me whether I posted such a comment.

Isn't it strange that when I ask Ranger 4 - who is the original poster of this thread - to explain where he got the information he cited in his original post, instead of getting a reply from him (and I've asked him twice now today) I get a response from you?

Any yet, you don't provide that information either.

Ranger4 wrote that you yourself had posted a certain comment; yet when he is asked where he got that information from, he makes no response, and instead you respond but you don't say where that information came from, either.

To ranger4:

Will you please answer my question to you timed at 20:08 yesterday:

Will you please tell us when TheShen predicted a rights issue?

('I believe the Shen could very well be correct in the idea that Alan asks shareholders to partake in another dillutive rights issue ...'
ranger4 Mon 19:35)

No, Raj; I am not suggesting that AIM makes rational people irrational, although it can certainly lose them a lot of money.

What I am saying is that it reflects people's irrationality - sometimes known as the madness of crowds.

AIMrocket is offering a more rational explanation for this present share price drop: people are taking profits on Anglesey in order to buy the latest hot stock.

Note that while these wild gyrations in the price of AYM have been taking place, nothing has actually gone wrong with the company. It's the same company it was when people were prepared to commit mayhem in order to own the shares, except that now they are prepared to commit mayhem to dump them and buy something else.

Yes, Raj - AIM is no more rational than the comments and whims of LSE members.

Generally, when a share price is flying, there are comments about what a marvellous company it is, and when the price slumps, you read about everything that is wrong with the company.

Share price movements are therefore very exaggerated, reflecting something bordering on manic depression.

I don't think there's much point in trying to make sense of prices on AIM, Manyana.

Take a look at LOGP, whose share price has hardly gone down in the past 2 weeks even though it is even more dependent on the outcome of these negotiations than is PVR.

Shareholders of AYM are scratching their heads in an attempt to explain the collapse in its share price from 10 pence to 3.85p, even though there is a stream of regular good news.

To ranger4:

Will you please answer my question to you timed at 20:08 yesterday:

Will you please tell us when TheShen predicted a rights issue?

Posted by p5vtr on advfn, 10/3/2021 at 09:03:

'No...Will be 1p after another rights issue...'

Will you please tell us when TheShen predicted a rights issue?

Well, ps, the discussions are 'well-advanced,' very much like the language used to describe Spoton's negotiations to raise finance to clinch its deal with PVR.

Someone mentioned the fact that SOU has a 47.5 percent interest.

What was it that JP negotiated - 13 percent?