Member Info for longtimeinvestor

At about 4113p some of the shares purchased at very low prices - still retain a lot of shares

But I have sold in the £50 's in the past, so still a long way to ho to reach the all time high of about £58

Nc

'' I don't think you are embarrassed as you 'delight' in looking for fault''

strange comment when the embarrassment is yours - another defence mechanism i guess.

NO what I look for are people lying.

''searching through endless posts to find 'one' that can be manipulated to 'fit' your agenda.''

Yet another fabrication- NOT manipulated - QUOTES from you.

My agenda is to call out people who have got things wrong, but don't admit it and then try to lie to cover things up - understand?

''as time will prove me right, again.''

you are deluded - you cannot be proved right about something that you have already been proven to be wrong about - any share price in the future foes not change that fact.

Nc

'' I don't think you are embarrassed as you 'delight' in looking for fault''

strange comment when the embarrassment is yours - another defence mechanism i guess.

NO what I look for are people lying.

''searching through endless posts to find 'one' that can be manipulated to 'fit' your agenda.''

Yet another fabrication- NOT manipulated - QUOTES from you.

My agenda is to call out people who have got things wrong, but don't admit it and then try to lie to cover things up - understand?

''as time will prove me right, again.''

you are deluded - you cannot be proved right about something that you have already been proven to be wrong about - any share price in the future foes not change that fact.

And

''All prepaid warrants are cleared, cash comes in''

NO - more shares coming to market on Monday

''No red flags;''

TNAV is about 2p per share, hence why warrant holders will sell all their shares above that figure.

Shareholders were not given the opportunity to purchase 750 million shares at 2p.

Fake Scam articles were launched when warrant holders were able to exercise them

NC

9 Dec 2024 09:51

Price: 53.38

''Despite the large drop in price, this, imo, is by no means anywhere near, 'factored in' it is only 'clutching at straws' hopefuls keeping it, atm, where the share price is''

NC

why is it that you cannot accept that you got it wrong and have then tried lying about a plummet from 54p to squirm your way out - it is clear for all to see

it is totally embarrassing

NC

1 Jan 2025 20:47

''Asperger new church would like you to submit 43p on her behalf to MM Yend 25 comp please.

She explained that due to the coming PPI 2 and the DCA car billions to pay back, that even that figure may be too conservative.''

4 Jan 2025 11:54

Price: 54.36

'' it has by far the largest percentage of car mis selling DCA fees to pay back, est aprox 26b, and the largest sum of late claims PPI, sum as yet not guestimated

So expect buybacks and divs to be slashed for years or ended and the share price to YET reflect such, as by no means 'already priced in' WHY, because of the endless dreamers and hopefuls who 'think' as it is not 'carved in stone' YEt that it won't happen.

Watch, learn, THEN judge, who was 'right'. ''

and btw , buybacks continued and the dividend was increased

NC

''Don't bother going on and on about this, as you will endlessly, you are wrong, I was right''

No YOU were wrong - it did not crash from the 54p as you had suggested it would, it ROSE about 50%

STOP your misinformation/fabrication

NC

''Lti, WRONG, I never said it would 'crash' FROM the 54p level, the share price of 54p had NOTHING to do with the predict, other than that the share price was 54p at the time I said that Lloyds would plummet upon the S.C decision, WHICH is still to come.''

FFS talk about trying to squirm your way out of what you posted at the time, unbelievable - you said it would crash and to expect a much lower level. from where it was.

I have pointed out since that you would claim victory if the price retreated retreated yo say 65p, and that is now clearly you new aim - get justification from a much higher level of share price,

Once again as I have already pointed out to you. You may have cost people big profits ALREADY, no matter where the share price goes from the recent high. Understand?

NC

''Lti, WRONG, I never said it would 'crash' FROM the 54p level, the share price of 54p had NOTHING to do with the predict, other than that the share price was 54p at the time I said that Lloyds would plummet upon the S.C decision, WHICH is still to come.''

FFS talk about trying to squirm your way out of what you posted at the time, unbelievable - you said it would crash and to expect a much lower level. from where it was.

I have pointed out since that you would claim victory if the price retreated retreated yo say 65p, and that is now clearly you new aim - get justification from a much higher level of share price,

Once again as I have already pointed out to you. You may have cost people big profits ALREADY, no matter where the share price goes from the recent high. Understand?

NC

''So if you tell me to 'sell'''

I asked how many had you sold, based on your 'Black Monday etc etc posts

answer -''none''

NC

''Lti in answer to your question as to why I wondered if you had bought in more, clearly the answer being that the warning from the SC that markets will be moved by their decision means 'either up' or 'down'. ''

Your logic has gone totally out of the window - I HAVE MADE SALES

I do no trade based on speculation and 'what if's'

''As you dis my assumption they will drop, then surely it only leaves your mindset to feel they will rise. So if you tell me to 'sell' if I feel as I do, then obviously then you ought to be buying more to gain on the outcome.''

Why don't you try to think a bit more clearly before making stupid posts?

Where have I given an opinion about the share price movement regarding the SC judgement?

I have pointed out that YOU suggested a crash from the 54p level

I have pointed out that proved to be wrong and in fact the price rose about 50%.

I have pointed out that people put off buying your crash from 54p comment has missed out on a big upside movement.

Shares in issue from Monday, providing that no further warrants exercised tomorrow

This total is more than the sum of post consolidation shares plus exercised warrants

Dust

''So no, I wouldn't know if its you as I said''

a little time before - you have reading/memory issues

21:42

Lti

''25th March or 11th April - but a bit irrelevant - warrant holders will sell all shares that they get.''

Dust

got to be dumb not to know who the quote is - I have posted it a few times

I

21:42

Lti

''25th March or 11th April - but a bit irrelevant - warrant holders will sell all shares that they get.''

Dust

don't know what anyone wouldn't understand about

''25th March or 11th April - but a bit irrelevant - warrant holders will sell all shares that they get.''

Note 'irrelevant' - not worth discussing. It was always known it was a 6 month exercise period.

Tof

''Note: periodic exercising of warrants''

you are clueless - they are getting rid in a sustained controlled manner

Private investors currently hold most of the shares

Lti

''25th March or 11th April - but a bit irrelevant - warrant holders will sell all shares that they get.''