Member Info for linton

Eskers and DHC the same person. Mind blown

...great thing about this RNS is that it confirms that MPS/GPHA agreement is all that we’re waiting for. No other blockages. Once they’ve signed their agreement then ours is signed. Could be any day between now and Christmas. Ho ho ho.

She moves fast! Happy days.

It may not be financially material or move the dial on the share price but it does draw a line under one of the biggest debacles in the company’s history and was mentioned in the AGM statement so I think it is newsworthy.

Even if they don’t think it is RNS worthy or not worth the cost (which is a nonsense excuse), there are plenty of other channels to get this news out, like an news item on the website.
The silence stinks of hoping to bury it in another announcement. The optimist in me says that’s because another positive announcement is due soon. The realist says it’ll be in the usual Christmas Eve pump RNS.

Ha ha. Fair point.

Spookily you know a lot about a*seholes.

If I had a pound for every time that Foxy mentions the word ‘cusp’, I might have made back all my losses here.

So glad I sold my VAST shares over the summer to top up here. (Insert rolling eyes emoji here). Sigh. Come on PF. Give us something.

You forgot that trick where he makes your money disappear.

Hmm...probably shouldn’t have told my boss where to stick his job yesterday. Going to be an awkward morning.

RNS in the morning! Set the alarm. Book the day off work. Pop the fizzy fermented grape juice in the fridge!

Or not. Suit yourself.

But using Mike’s figures, that would be c. £50k revenue. Not esp mouthwatering? Surely throughput must have ramped up since then now we’re “fully operational”?

Ha ha. Back to law school for you Jimzi.

Speculating about what “in the coming weeks” means is like my kids analysing what I mean by “in a minute”. Completely nebulous.

If in administration, won’t the warrants simply be an asset that the administrator can sell to someone else?

The LOI is four pages long. Of course it’s not comprehensive! I’ve seen longer terms and conditions at the fairground.

Sake

I think we’ve moved beyond the era of anecdotal evidence.

https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-7783/CBP-7783.pdf

Significant reliance on EU nationals.

So just to get this straight, you think that because not time limit was mentioned that means that MPS granted us an indefinite period of exclusivity? *slaps forehead*