Member Info for LimaLiam

Perhaps not equally effect measured in that way, but effective none the less.

Like you say, we should feel good about P3 results if that is the case.

*Beginning

Probably commencement would have been a better word anyway.

It absolutely would affect data integrity.

As frustrating as it is, we will be rewarded for the data first by-the-book approach.

Would love to see an RNS stating begging of mass production come a couple of days after the data is unblinded. It wont happen of course, but it would be a great way to inflate the SP pre readout.

Maybe sleep on thst thought a few times before committing to that idea.

This has been a roller coaster so far (so a bumpy ride would be par for the course), but I think the upside of being undervalued is that we will get more stability compared to if the price was higher.

Great, thanks.

My thinking was that the data is being unblinded around that date and with interim readout being an option in the trial protocol perhaps the data will be handed over immediately.

It gives some reason to that date, but wishful thinking by the sounds of thing.

So once the data set is open they'll look at it themselves rather than waiting for SNG to analyse and publish it.

Smooth move if thats the deal, they might get their authorisation and orders in before America that way.

On ethical grounds, for reasons of outstanding efficacy.

Shall we re-name the thread or start another?

Love to see it drop, so we can buy more.

Well whatever it was SkyMonkey, she'd brag about it.

Yeah, if planets align, let's say three didgits in GBP. And the first digit isn't necessarily a 1.

But lets get data first.

Yes, relaxing restrictions seem like a bit of a missed step to me, although I will admit rather a welcome one. I think everyone was tired of restrictions.

Do you think they'll return if things get worse?

I mean in his defense the document provided makes it very clear you are more likely to test positive if you're vaccinated (unless under 18). It's there in black and white.

But the other points you state are backed up by the same document.

Also, interesting how those posters are only active between 0800 and 1630 Mon - Fri ist it? Why could that be?

Sorry, minimising buying pressure and maximise 'floating' shares.

Yeah, it felt like the board was under assault yesterday. And really going for it with some flat out lies too! I see the lies more and more now that there is such a solid case for this, it becomes hard to undermine the facts so just lie.

I really don't think 'they' are targeting us, I think 'they' just want to reduce the number of new entrants (who are likely to hold until results) to minimise buying pressure and 'floating' shares as much as possible. Traders are probably fine with 'them' I'd imagine as they make a SP more volatile and will ultimately sell in the short term anyway.

LTH all seem hardened to it, prospects if you're investing based on what you see in a BB, maybe do a bit more of your own research (amusingly that counts for my post too). If youre genuinely "thinking of investing" and are here for support ask for supporting studies or where is a good place to start your own research, we'd all love to help (others will have better suggestions than me I'd think).

Yeah? well I researched interferon in the 70s and we found it worked 100% of the time.

In fact this drug look best.

Surely its lots of small sells getting mopped up in large buys?

Yes, I think that's fair to say Deal3r.

Let's all get along shall we?