Member Info for Legalease

Sorry Penguins , are you saying you a share holder?

I am sure the OPEC agreement will be reflected n the price of oil next week:)

I am me, reported for spreading lies.

Why did you not say he ramps for someone else then? I think thou doth protest too much. Imo you attempted to infer he worked for SS, and have been Caledonia out on it.

skwizz D should have had an eg rather than an ie.

Not a ramper , just a shareholder who expects the share price to rise significantly over the coming weeks and months....just as it has done on numerous occasions before.

Never been banned. Never used a different Id.

If Tymers is working for Ukog then he is commiting Market abuse, if he isn’t you are making a libellous comment which one is it?

Yes, but you fall into category D.

‘Works opposite tbh.Why be here if you are confident of your investment.
If you are why are you here ?’

That is laughable statement.

Shareholders have an interest in the company, so it is entirely normal to want to chat about their shared interest. Shareholders are nearly always open about their position.

Now why others repeatedly post here (in share they say they have no financial interest in in) minute after minute, day after day, month after month, and in some cases year after year, remains a mystery, in my views they must be;

A. Barking mad, and hence can be safely ignored.
B. Environmentalists (See A’)
C. NIMBYs, typical in their hypocracy that they do not admit their position
D. Those that have some other positions in Ukog, ie shorters (which do exist as evidenced by the occasional one who admits their position)
E. Bitter X shareholders -easily identifiable.

Nimbyism is normally about being a hypocrite, ie what’s good for the gander is certainly not good for the goose, exactly what the conservative mp in question has proved himself to be....

I.e a NIMBY is a person who objects to the siting of something perceived as unpleasant or hazardous in their own neighbourhood, especially while raising no such objections to similar developments elsewhere.
"rural development arouses intense suspicion from Nimbys and conservationists"

I agree, re run Of the Bergen Bros scenario.

You witnessed the turning point today imo.

Agreed:)

A?

Apologies for the broken nature of my message, either my phone or LSE playing up tonight!

However, unlike some, I think 10% will be enough to see 10 bags at least here.

I personally think they will go to 10%. For me, peeps who are thinking 20 or 25% are wide of the mark irrespective of where those rumours have. One from.

What do peeps think the odds are in respect of Cannacord increasing their position beyond 20%

Answer Y if you think they will, answer N if you don’t. I expect those trying to influence peeps will not be able to resist posting more than a Y or a N, but I will let you guys make your own decisions on that point:)

Intention is not to goad anyone, but what do peeps think such a declaration would do to to;

A. Confidence
B. The free float
C. Perception of UKOG...(the detractors would have laughed out of the room the idea anyone, let alone an investment bank, would take a 5% stake in Ukog,before it happened; now they just pretend it didn’t happen)
D. 1000 bopd per day
E. Positive post EWT Updated CPR
An upturn in Sentiment... potentially caused by a,b,c,d and e
f debt financing

I reckon in excess of 10 bags would follow in quick succession:)