Member Info for leew

Audivid, good move and like most investors there are many ways to make positions work for you that being a very good example around early April time 👍

The prices in the background are working their way up in SP and volumes quoted so good to see

No official date on news, if you want to ask send something to Tim and I always get feedback to sensible questions that don’t involve giving you info he cant.

3m can be sold for 15% more than the advertised bid, price / QTY been increasing and the ask is closing up so actual spread is tightening. Might see a SP movement soon based on what the data suggests but that’s short term data so can change in a nano second with a micro cap lol

Well selling 1m is now above the mid price (just) and has been creeping up the last couple of days, creeping up to low levels but creeping up nevertheless.

The answer was at the start of my reply “corporate governance” at the first attempt and having received the feedback they are acting accordingly and all RNA’s state they are going for a MiCA license.

Now be very careful about your understanding of transparency, independence, and what is normal in business.

Ignoring the fact that the 4 business linked to an address and then via a person will have no affect on the MiCA aspect within GST as that’s not the same thing. Also typically if people have an interest in x amount of business it is very usual that financially and governance wise they are fully separated as that is the whole point of doing it.

You don’t have 4 companies link by a person if they are not independent in every way, and is very typical in a growing business / corporation as you can shed activities with ease without burdening other legal entities with liabilities.

The fact that the companies then promote each other is then just basic common sense and exactly as it would be.

The corporate governance of aspects within the relevant business segment (pillar) applying for the MiCA license is what they were suggesting, got feedback on, and looking to reapply based on that feedback. Assumption would be stop trading the crypto aspect months earlier than needed is part of some changes but that is just a speculation.

Suggesting it’s because of the Businesses you listed being registered at one address is like coming up with 2+2 = 8. The business address for Sement for instance has nothing to do with GST not getting MiCA.

How owners, businesses, and corporate governance (even at a low capitalisation level) is not someone’s

strong point I assume.

To run multiple businesses from the same address is very normal and for some of them businesses to be linked via personnel is perfectly ok and normal, and each business advertising the other service again is very normal.

Anyway no point arguing or trying to explain so just let it drift away and no doubt will have some new revelations tomorrow. Probably back on to legal or balance sheet expertise soon.

Let me see, because that’s not abnormal within businesses especially if service related. Go look up some other world addresses and feel free to blow your mind.

Also is this something you are just learning now after years of negative input and research into GST lol.

Tomorrow you will advise us that Australia is an island.

Enki, not sure on the update but it’s within the time period historical that we have been given the company wide updates so we will see.

I can sell a larger QTY for a higher price than a few days ago.

Ah ok cheers, I prefer crypto in a wallet anyway so might as well do the same with COAL 👍 thanks I will

Navigate that tonight

Moomins, did you have to transfer the coal to your coal lite account? I have mine in BAKE still and wondered if you had to transfer and if you did how did you do it?

Great update, and reality is for the investment it’s good but for ultimately why I am here it’s another step in the right direction.

Yes accounting requirements, not physical lose of money or expenditure so a Column in a sheet changes. Balance Sheet accounting is very different to actual cash / company position and actual affect on a business the investment in COAL / the way it was acquired affected the bottom line a long time ago, but I guess you know that anyway and just another opportunity for some great reporting.

Coal is not new news it’s been unable to trade on an exchange for a long time, hence GST via BAKE told everyone to get out of COAL and put it in Defi.

The amount of coal that GST had was valued at about the same as a bag of carrots, now was it valued at a bag of carrots when they invested in coal x years ago, obviously not, but for the last few years it has been that value and was obvious the project failed back a long while back.

Cardinal, yes it’s nice and how it should be, let the company produce news and then we discuss the news, rather than alternative versions of reality.

They are listed in the U.K.

Chaebol,

From your comment below

“Zheng and zhu are not worried what GST may have because otherwise they would have settled!”

Do you agree the flip side is GST would not be worried about their evidence either as it is GST’s choice to go this route not the defendant’s. GST won’t be going in to this thinking their evidence is not good enough surely you have to accept the flip side to all your arguments against GST?

Rob, there was an RNA telling you it all happened on Friday?

ii is still lagging on what it displays but if I trade through the holding showing as ROQ I am trading COIL and all works out.

The change has happened I don’t understand what you are saying, it’s just systems trying to catch up with the RTO

Chaebol, am I really reading your interpretation of different levels of legal representation being that you add them all up and form an hourly rate that means all the levels are holding hands and working with each other for each and every hour?

That level of legal understanding is beyond basic, you’re interpreting AI information on a subject you seemly don’t understand and reaching some really interesting conclusions. If you do understand and chose to present it in a “strange” way that made it more negative analysis that’s a different story.

Like I said days ago to try and interpret how much this will cost with the info available is best left well alone, but let’s be frank this is a simple case in theory but even that is a dangerous assumption until all aspects are known.

Like I said before it’s ok not to know something and if you don’t, best to provide less analysis.

I ignore the spread shown in GST, it dropped 7.5% from the start when sell bid had improved for volume lol.

It will be what it will be, and does not need the nonsense posted.

Today we have had the defendants are defending it so must be poor for GST, forgetting GST started the process so maybe they are equally confident lol.

Then we have the usual AI generic info that gets interpreted to show GST are doomed in every way.

Then to be critical of me, we get posts like mine written here are equally as pointless