RE: Compliance29 Feb 2020 16:39
H5O, I agree that the market should have the details of the deal as soon as it concluded, so MTL owed the banks, the banks loans are paid off by the major shareholders, so we now owe the major shareholders for both the existing mezzanine loans and the new loan (the one to pay off the banks) this has made the major shareholders not only shareholders, but financiers, they haven’t got any more equity in MTL with that deal, the banks total amount accepted may or may not have been reduced, but either way that won’t benefit MTL even if it had, as MTL have basically swopped lenders, a bit like if you change your mortgage, the amount owed doesn’t change, only the rate and terms offered by the new financier, on that basis, MTL must have already agreed terms with the major shareholders, you wouldn’t change your mortgage without knowing the new lenders rates and terms, so why has DB hinted at a possible D4E? is it because he’s unsure he can meet these new repayment terms, so perhaps the major shareholders suggest lowering the Quarterly repayments with a release of new shares in exchange for reduced debt, that way the major shareholders finally get a bigger piece of the blatantly improving company, no doubt they would prefer that, but, MTL may decide the recent gold price increase will make meeting the terms possible and hold back from releasing more shares, no D4E, or they could offer the whole market a share offer, that way they get a cash injection without increasing the major shareholders percentage, if I was MTL that would be the route to take, even $10 million raised from a additional share offer would give them the cushion to increase gold recoveries over the next year and assure they can meet payments in year 1 of a possible 3 year repayment plan, MTL wouldn’t have changed financier if the terms were crazy or impossible.
If this whole deal is not classed as finalised, as such why we haven’t been informed is because MTL and the major shareholders (new financiers) haven’t agreed the final route to take, as in whether they actually need to reduce the loan size, or to raise additional funds from a share offer, or not increase the share total by carring on digging gold and making enough cash to keep everyone paid, $1600 dollar gold plus ever increasing production is certainly making that possible, it’s maybe 3 options that they can’t decide on.
Either way, I have said it before, we are not going bust, so 1p a share is ridiculous and don’t forget it, it’s easy to lose sight of that fact, silly cheap whichever option they choose.
Have a nice weekend all, relax, all will come good.