Member Info for leapfrog

Please yourself in writing this off`so far I have not done that.Patience is required although I would agree patience is stretched thin.

The late sales were shown at 0.13p so in my opinion they were buys.I also made a purchase at fractional under 0.13p just adding to holdings As I said before the shares are for fractions of a penny, based on the fundamentals they are almost for free.Lots of similarities between NMG and KRS, KRS is within weeks of production earnings. NMG is less than 6 months before production, speculatively circa Q3. As production time gets closer.So more PIs become interested the sp is bound to move forward towards the half pence plus mark. A reasonable assumption for anyone buying in now is they will be looking at a 3 to 4 times profit against todays sp. What was it a golden "prospect for a profit" true on this sp even if little transpires there will be a profit the basics are now in place. I like that, "Just don't blame anyone else" unlike some ! AtB

What is it that makes the man "incompetent "apart from assumptions concerning management style and decisions. You will obviously have spoken at length with the man about your concerns so what was the outcome? Your concerns were serious enough to speak about with knowledgable friends, Presumably they had spoken with the BOD of NMG so were in possession of all the facts? To be able to make correct comment ? How do you reconcile holding onto a stock if there are management concerns I would be long gone.

Speculatively might be almost time to open a bottle or two.

The problem is the media expert? Believed the talk at the time of presumably investing,no complaints then. Some experts should realise once news is announced it becomes old news. Like driving to work, normal trip 35 minutes,early holiday traffic ,overturned caravan,detour equals an hour late,just like a BOD trying to get to its set targets on time.Things happen. No matter a bad or a good interview the facts of the matter are information was forthcoming, choosing to believe it is up to individual shareholders. Shareholders always have the choice of selling out when the price starts to fall many don't in the vein hope of recovery so it is their own fault to continue holding without loss criteria thinking in place.most blame everybody else except themselves. Here is a consistently changing good ongoing scenario concerning potential gold production within a reasonable 6 month time frame,the shares are so little valued as to make it negligent not to acquire bucket load or two. Remembering loss criteria should be in place. What I know about gold mining timing makes me interested in being invested here. I liked the "no sharing irony" sharing which is of course going on, profits and losses with IRS? Plus the rinse and repeat story makes for a clearer target especially if we are on the last on the last rinse. AtB

You will be referring to loose ~ you'r correct. Although a dialectic argument can be put in place My pets ~"I before e except after c rule" alongside their and there. Then The spelling mantra "i before e except after c" is no longer worth teaching, according to the government So language with life moves on. NMG is not static it is moving forward which is why I and presumably others choose to take the risks associated with such an investment to nail down possible profits. AtB

It is cringeworthy to see a PI tell intelligent investors he know more than they do about how and where they should or should not invest their money.Not on;y cringeworthy but arrogant to say the least. The following is speculation but It is not without the realms of possibility that you invested in this stock and lost a lot of money because of a failure to use stop losses even perhaps persuaded others to join in this marvellous investment that could not go wrong.without the balls to back your advice word up and cover their losses The reality to any investment in AIM is only bet what you can afford to loose. AtB

Just listened to the podcast. Kindly thank the man for answering all the questions without any hesitation. Well done you .

Exactly. Its why I am invested here before the herd arrives. Potential is all here, in a month or two at the most those invested will be looking forward to news,as more investors come aboard having concluded the situation MIGHT be the same as KRS.Who incidentally have a similar track record. So will the sp move forward from circa a tenth of a penny yes it will,It will be a very strange phenomina if it goes against such simple expectations. Realistically looking at an sp of 0.25p to 0.35p in the run up to news or at least 100% up on todays sp.

Being realistic such Q and A's as proposed will not get a response other than what might be expected. Like it or not they will state chapter and verse events which justify past decisions very little of which PI's will be aware. If a PI gets wound up about the stock best go to a meeting and ask questions, it would be interesting but no more than that because its old hat. If attacking a BOD do it with precision on current activities not past activities. Simple question about a BODs attitude to an employee stealing or how would the BOD deal with an artisan miner found on their concession who claims to own rights etc., or what is BODS understanding of its duty of care to shareholders, those kind of innocuous questions can leave the BOD wide open to attacked on what ever issue is considered relevant. If a PI sells out too late is it the BODs fault. Some Pis have serious money in here based on the potential outcome of the news as published by the company which is the responsibility of the BOD.We can guess roughly when the news is expected and if it is going to be on schedule. A simple polite phone call will generally elicit some sort of information in confirmation of news timing expectations .Its then up to our thinking do we profit before or risk pulling out and not making as much profit or not~assumptions made.The past record of initial expectations and failure of an AIM co is usual for one such as NMG has displayed ~ So nothing new there then ?

Another question ~What would be their hypothetical earnings forecast for the year?

Apologies must have punch the post twice.

Noricum Gold Managing Director Greg Kuenzel said, "This update demonstrates the breadth and speed of both the activities underway at our two priority gold ore production targets, and also our ongoing work to continually assess the prospectivity of the full licence area. Having recently raised £1 million which is sufficient to see us through to production in Q3 2016, we intend to firstly produce gold ore from Kvemo Bolnisi where drilling is currently underway, and then at Tsitel Sopeli. In tandem, we will conduct an IP survey which will allow us to detect mineralisation at far greater depth than has previously been possible which we are confident will highlight new areas of mineralisation as well as refine existing drill targets. We all know things can go wrong to delay schedules and upset budgets so several questions. Is The Million £ budget sufficient to bring only the first mine to production or is their enough to bring both mines to production.There will be a margin for error so have any delays been encountered so far.if so what are they? Are they on time and on budget as of now. Are the assets proving up as expected. Will the mining be alluvial or hard rock.or both ?which will be first exploited in the start up phase Once mining starts how long is the planned delivery time to first gold production. What quantities of production are expected and planned for ~that is not how a long is a piece of string question they must have planned expectations for delivery of gold within a time frame before funds expire etc., With regard to permits licences etc., have there been any delays through bureaucracy so far.Are any envisaged if so what? Kindly consider bringing those questions to the interview.Thank you for the opportunity. AtB

Noricum Gold Managing Director Greg Kuenzel said, "This update demonstrates the breadth and speed of both the activities underway at our two priority gold ore production targets, and also our ongoing work to continually assess the prospectivity of the full licence area. Having recently raised £1 million which is sufficient to see us through to production in Q3 2016, we intend to firstly produce gold ore from Kvemo Bolnisi where drilling is currently underway, and then at Tsitel Sopeli. In tandem, we will conduct an IP survey which will allow us to detect mineralisation at far greater depth than has previously been possible which we are confident will highlight new areas of mineralisation as well as refine existing drill targets. We all know things can go wrong to delay schedules and upset budgets so several questions. Is a Million £ budget really sufficient to bring the first mine to production.Their will be a margin for error so have any delays been encountered so far.if so what are they? Are they on time and on budget as of now. Are the assets proving up as expected. Will the mining be alluvial or hard rock.or both ?which will be first exploited in the start up phase Once mining starts how long is the planned delivery time to first gold production. What quantities of production are expected and planned for ~that is not how a long is a piece of string question they must have planned expectations for delivery of gold within a time frame before funds expire etc., With regard to permits licences etc., have there been any delays through bureaucracy so far.Are any envisaged if so what?

Thanks for the chuckle there will be a lot more profit taking when the price really rises so I guess it could be called dumping stock.I will certainly be selling my holdings at a predetermined figure and that will mean I am dumping the stock. A little sad I did not buy more when the price was in the circa .08s most of my buys were just at 0.09.thats less than a tenth of a penny,well pleased as this stock has only one way to go over the next 6 months,Gold is in demand and fashionable, of course there will be some muppets that think a price rises in a straight line on a day to day or week to week basis,it rarely if ever happens so we can expect a fall back to circa 0.07p at some point Then again judging by the number of posts this one is still well under the radar of the PIs and will be for some time when they get interested the sp could be a different matter. Seems we already have a resident troll, a bit early but then such a residency is generally a sign of good things to come. Personally if the price falls I will certainly consider adding to holdings. AtB

The comment that this stock 'is a bargain' is true at circa a tenth of a penny with the published news and the fact that gold is of interest the sp has only one way to go. Make your own minds up if the above thinking will be profit productive. AtB

Basic type common sense indicates the sp has to rise form 0.09/.0.13 to probably double or treble the current sp simply because of the published news concerning expected production and for the foreseeable future Gold is fashionable in an uncertain economic world. It is also clear from the steadily increasing interest being generated that it won't take the sp long to make 0.3p/0.4p there it will still be a sub penny share with golden prospects. AtB

Will do so especially when there is any change in the waiting time or if anything else concerning CICC/CIG/SB come up on my radar.

Sage is right it is still sit back and relax CICC and CICG moving forward. Spoke with SB today. So it is waiting as usual.

I was keeping an eye on this stock for possible investment,it is now off my radar. In my book of rules if a CEO or any member of the BOD fails to respond to share holders e-mails or telephone calls there is something wrong. I would check up on who the senior investors were and advise them of the BODs failure in its duty of care to respond to reasonable shareholders.So thank you for the information.