RE: Reality16 Feb 2024 09:24
Morning Koolkat, I agree with RF being the only viable option. Not necessarily the bankruptcy comment though as we should be funded through to end of Ph1b. Also, the comment "subject to funding" is a necessary caveat as the Board are not permitted to mislead investors if they do not have sufficient funds at this moment in time. I would imagine that the Nomad would have picked this up if they hadn't stated it themselves (maybe the Nomad did)
The Board have to be honest when they are being open about progress and developments otherwise they would be rightly crucified. It is also a personal integrity issue.
We can all see the flaw in the financing deal however, the flipside of the coin should also be examined. Some of the detractors here still think that there is a magic money tree or a queue of would be lenders out there. Sareum had to move quickly and had to move away from UK in order to make progress or whither on the vine. Setting up a subsidiary Company in Oz to facilitate things and moving the business plan forward at speed after the UK delays. Can you imagine the board had Sareum gone for the 50p per share when they were sat at over £1? The Board have worked diligently to get this going. The CEO will be aware of his numbers and his balance sheet, H&S, Regulatory compliance requirements, tax laws, scientific developments and manufacturing requirements not to mention dealing with would be suitors, legal requirements and NDA implications. Meetings, non-official presentations and market regulations all require attention.
These guys sacrificed salary for shares. This told me the believed in their science and themselves. How many of you guys would work for nothing or for a deferred period? And they did this all for what? Personal vitriol from individuals who, once the sp reaches a higher level, will sell their shares and never be seen or heard of again.
Anyway, enough from me. There are 2 sides to a coin