RE: RNS19 Aug 2021 22:04
Vinc, if they engaged strategically, they should be able to explain why they are worth way more than 5.8p that SAG offered. By engaging they should try and see what synergies could a possible take over bring for them from the other side. There is nothing wrong by being taken over. Both sides of shareholders could benefit.
However they completely refused any discussion, as it sounds. SAG is just slowly buying cheap shares. They may become a a majority holder over time by accumulating shares sub 5.8p (the share prices is clearly not moving much at the moment) and will start influencing business, which TP's management may not enjoy and the whole thing could have a negative impact on the business.