RE: Surely30 Apr 2018 12:59
Take your comments y'day.
What makes you think it is up to NTOG solely to prove anything? North may indeed be the operator but they too will have legal and commercial obligations to NTOG i.e those outlined within the JOA which we are not of course privy to.
I do not feel you can simply say it is up to NTOG to prove everything. The accountability will lie with *both* companies to prove and disprove the claims/counterclaims filed against each other respectively. It will not solely be upon NTOG. In addition, arbitration will be the first process I am assuming. You do not have inside information so cannot simply state we shd factor in 'losing the case'. If so, then by the same token, you cld equally state we cld factor in winning the case, no? Neither statement is valid.
Personally I prefer not to �predict� such outcomes and instead await the decision which is the only certainty. I also doubt it will be a case of they win, we lose and/or v.v. I am sure there will be more to this especially as there are counterclaims involved and hence it wont be so black and white as you like to outline ...with your consistent yet unclear negative bias....?