Member Info for Lakshmi888

Yup Ester, Im the fool no doubt abt it! It's going to hit �15.00 even �25.00 and Im the fool b/c I didnt buy in. You've been ramping for more than a week-anyone can see that from your history!! Guess, I'll just have to live with it and be in awe of people like you who pluck figures from thin air and cant back those figures up *but* yup, it's defintetly going to �25.00 because you said so. Forget the likes of the FDA and EMA. They don't matter!! Dear oh dear..............!;)

So peeps, Ester claims I am ''Desperate''!! Here are just some of Ester's claims of the past week: ''This week is going to see it return to much higher levels IMHO.'' '' Big rise this week, nailed on'' ''It's rising mate, no doubt about it at all'' '' You will see the SP rise on no news....on news you will see it treble...minimum...IMO and that a conservative estimate'' ''I see no reason why we won�t be being re-rated back to several quid on news of the review, successful Japanese Trial and we�re 15 quid easy'' ''they were at 850p pre-trial, success would have taken them to 25 easy mate.'' ''Agreed, 25 quid is easy on'' ''Back to five quid IMO'' ''were at rock bottom here'' (It's fallen since that post btw!) etc etc I truly feel for the geunine holders here -especially with these kind of posts. I'd suggest it's you who is desperate Ester, and confused, not me!! GL:)

Posting b/c I can, lol! Indeed anyone can. I dont need to be invested to post or is that new rule Stew??! So, those posting objectively with facts and insight into the industry shd move on but the rampers claiming �25 shd stay?? Oh the irony!! I'll be staying if it's all the same to you, lolol!! :)

Posting b/c I can, lol! Indeed anyone can. I dont need to be invested to post or is that new rule Stew??! So, those posting objectively with facts and insight into the industry shd move on but the rampers claiming �25 shd stay?? Oh the irony!! I'll be staying if it's all the same to you, lolol!! :)

Dissection of RNS of 11 May ''Early analysis of certain biomarker indicators suggest that the treatment did not produce the expected interferon-beta bioactivity in the treatment group that was previously seen in Faron's Phase I/II trial for Traumakine.'' That was apparent from the data and outcomes of the previous RNS so nothing new being stated in this paragraph. ''It is still too early to understand why this is the case and there are a number of possible causes that the Company are investigating including, inter alia, formulation, administration and deactivation. Further detailed analysis of the data and testing of product batches still needs to be conducted, and therefore there is no guarantee that this will ultimately prove to be conclusive or, of the resultant implications of that analysis. '' So, in essence, what they are stating is a whole variety of reasons/possible cuases which they dont yet know for which CT 3 failed. These reasons cld be applicable to any CT 3 for any drug. They even state there is ''no guarantee that this will ultimately prove to be conclusive or, of the resultant implications of that analysis.'' So, Im absolutely confused as to why so many of you are pinning your hopes on this RNS?? *IF* they are to find out what the causes of the failure of CT3 are attributable to, it doesn't detract from the fact CT 3 failed and finding out the cause does not 'fix' e'thing. Do the rampers wish to inform us what the company need to do in order to then resolve this further? I know the answer but just wondering if you all think it's just a simple straightforward case of finding the cause, and hey presto, it's all ok??! It actually means they need to go back to the drawing board and goodness knows how long this will set them back and how much... Pis discussing mcap, oversold, limited shares,etc is just mind boggling. It will all be irrelevant if CT3 has failed (which it did) and worse still, if Japan's data/ouctome is not significantly different from this data. And even then, they still need to be accountable for what went wrong in this part'r trial and why and no doubt, repeat it all over again...as best case scenario imho..... The patient count involved also seems a bit on the low side to me for a CT3 stage...... No disrespect, but I feel like Im in a parallel universe on this bb wrt some here, lol!! ;)

PMSL NH!! Making me lol! But ......Im kinda partial to cake/any dessert.....and Im kinda hungry at the mo... I cant get onto FARN bb can you believe.If I were paranoid I'd say they don't like me over there (ahem!) but Im thinking it's some glitch with LSE as cant even see me quickpicks or anything. So, as for Mannan's posts, they'd be lost on me currently cos I can hardly see/do anything! Flipping heck...I bet I get locked out of PANR next, lol..... Yup, Im watching the US markets presently. Indices looking bullish but want a pullback...And for Natural Gas to drop. And oil to soar....I dont ask for much!! :D PS I can run v fast when I want/need to, dont you worry!! ;)

Pizzaman, Brokerman....hypocrites, both of them when you consider their backgrounds!! Yes, we r v cool Mister;)

Thanks and Good Morning Lejjb. Only just, mind;)) Hope you had a gd w/e.

No need to apologise at all Nighthawk. E'one is calling me he/mate/guy etc as of late inc. on Twitter! I love footie but I draw the line at being called a bloke, lol!! PMSL re. Mannan! Noted, haha:) Best of luck with PANR, hope it comes good for us all and proves all the non-believers/derampers very wrong. Esp that TW! He's a great contrarian indicator imho! :)

Morning Wideyed. My answer to your q'n in your mornin post is within my posts so wont repeat;) And, Im a 'she' to make it easier for you in the future, lol! Best of Luck :)

to see positive sentiment and posts return here. As always, just a case of patience if holding for the MT-LT. Daily sp irrelevant. GLA:)

Yes, and I stand by it. We got a positive RNS. That is factual. The sp rose on the back of that. Not on rampers or silly sp claims! The difference is my posts here are based on facts BRB1. Not pie in the sky claims. Ive read the RNS's. I know how the industry works. Do you?? But then, you just refuse to accept any opinion other than the ramps I guess. My pov being divergent to the rampers here doesnt make me a deramper though Im sure many of you wld like to have others believe that, LOL! As said, my issue here is wrt to claims of dble figures and �25.00 and also that the data may be incorrect ie errors etc. Read up on CTs, protocols etc. *IF* this is proven to be true, there wont be any quick fix.... Never mind...........!!;)

Lol N/Hawk, No problem!:) Contrarian indicator when you get all the derampers as per Friday proved ......hehe!! Full force indeed again this morning:)

Popeye, you got it in one re CT3!:) Normally, if a drug fails at CT3, it ends there in most cases.... W.r.t. your q'n, let's just say part of my experience includes Drug Research & Dvpmnt (within Oncology).... But as said, Im just giving my pov and some facts abt pharma, CTs. FDA & EMA which anyone can 'Giggle' if they so choose to...;) My thoughts re sp are irrelevant and subjective but at least I base my pov on research and I just dont want newbies to lose ��� and for existing holders to be aware of the alternative outcomes.... No-one knows re Japan's data yet and what effect it cld have...and whether it will be enough to change FARN's fortunes/outlook even if positive...

Welcome Popeye62:) I;d be very happy for holders if it rose but at present I just cant see it reurning to �8.50 let alone �25. Buthey, what do I know, lol?! Yes, that is the best conspiracy theory Ive ever come across. A total classic!! So IIs and mngt bought in near the peak so they cld lose up to 80% of their ��� some weeks later???! Huh??! GL if you're a holder:)

Hi Nighthawk:) Wld like it to but we shall see. Im it for the longer haul so wanting multibaggers from here rather than a few %;) Nice to get this RNS and shut up some of the derampers/doom-mongers of recent days. Where do they all crawl out from?! Nothing better to do??! Still got the clowns saying this is a P&D based on this morning's RNS. The mind boggles, lol! Let's hope J & Co deliver and we await the next RNS............:) GL if you're in N/H:) PS Im a 'she', lol!

If I were part of the FDA and EMA I certainly wldnt be accepting Japan�s results/data without further investigations of this trial�.. Why do you think it costs millions or even billions from conception to get a drug to market and approx 5-8 yrs on average??! It isn�t as simple as some of you are making it out to be re the failure of CT3 or in rectifying it. I�ve worked for blue chip companies of UK, and Europe and especially USA origin, within academic, research, diagnostic, and also within many areas of the commercial fields, so I�ve done my research & am attempting to present facts, get pis to think & research, not to deramp. The question is: have the rampers done their research? That�s a legit question:) I wish e�one here genuinely good luck but if holding or looking to invest, FGS, research!! This is pharma, not O&G or mining. I genuinely hope Japan's data is favouable but I don't think that this is going to be a quick fix...... The lifeline of a pharma company is dependent on the successful completion of all stages of any drug dvpmnt process **and** its drug pipeline�..End of. AIMHO, DYOR etc. and apologies for clogging up this bb but the rampers need to substantiate their ramps imho if any kind of credibility is to be attached to their claims�. GLA :D

Here are just a few examples of drugs failed; one of those from last week! Other links show treatments that had to be withdrawn immed�y from the market despite having been FDA approved. Do you think FARN�s drug is simply going to be allowed to bypass what has happened. NO!! Take a look at the links. Note where most drugs failed. CT 3!! With all due respect, some here need a reality check�..forget �25!! Yes, this cld potentially increase somewhat but it may also decrease. Does a rise to say �2.00/�3.00/�5.00 etc constitute a success?? Erm, No! esp when you consider it was �8.50 prior to the release of CT 3 data. Ask yourselves one question which doesn�t seem to have crossed many of you. What will happen to the sp if Japan�s data�s is also unfavourable/negative??? Just a thought�.. https://www.fiercepharma.com/pharma/astrazeneca-s-fasenra-fails-its-second-copd-trial-handing-rival-gsk-a-win https://nypost.com/2017/04/13/abbott-failed-to-reveal-pacemaker-defect-fda/ https://pharmaphorum.com/news/novartis-heart-failure-drug-fails/ https://www.pharmaceutical-journal.com/news-and-analysis/news-in-brief/ms-drug-zinbryta-withdrawn-from-european-market/20204516.article https://www.reuters.com/article/us-biogen-zinbryta/biogen-abbvie-withdraw-multiple-sclerosis-drug-zinbryta-idUSKCN1GE1BV https://www.reuters.com/article/us-glaxosmithkline-theravance-breo/glaxosmithkline-lung-drug-fails-to-extend-life-in-huge-study-idUSKCN0R82GN20150909

Im trying to remain objective and factual, but truthfully, some people on here really do need to do some research into pharma especially if you�re going to invest and then ramp a company that just failed in CT 3, has next to no drug pipeline and are stating figures here based on the fact it must go up b/c it dropped so much!! Inpharma, it can never be 'oversold'! Actually it dropped to under �1.00 so maybe your so called bounce has already happened?? No-one yet knows.... My posts are fact based rather than pie in the sky claims. I have no idea where the sp is going but I have a right to express my opinion that imho it isnt entering dble figs anytime soon.... Also note, unlike the rampers I have not stated or claimed any sp at any stage throughout my posts. No-one can determine that but I will state that this: FARN is not going to double figures imho any time soon......That doesn't make me a deramper! ;) This is just an alternative pov....take it or leave it. Matters not to me nor does it affect my positioning w.r.t. FARN... Can it be traded, most likely yes. In fact. of course!! But that was not the debate......the question of �25.00 was.....or even double figures in truth.... And those who have traded and will trade FARN, Well Done and GL:))) That's what it's all abt. But for the rampers, don't lull innocent peeps/newbies into a share with unsubstantiated claims of �25. That's just both unethical & ridiculous imho! ;)

None of this is intended to scare or deramp but I�m getting the impression that many on here do not have an awareness of the stringency of regulations of drug treatments and trials within the pharma world. There is no grey area peeps. It is black or white. The drug has to be 100% effective *and* safe or it is a fail. End of. No �ifs�, no �buts� , no �maybes�. CT3 failed. Fact. FARN can do all the investigating they want but do you really think the appt bodies are not going to question why there were errors if that is what FARN is supposedly claiming? CTs are closely run/monitored/adhered to and a CT protocol has to be put into place and approved. If this was not adhered to such that errors were made, do you really think it is as simple as saying �ooh, we made a mistake and that is why the results were bad. If we just fix/amend XYZ, then it�ll all be ok�. No way hosay!!Sorry for being flippant but some on here need to get real re. pharma. The best case scenario would be a repetition from the beginning for CT 3 esp if Japan's data is negative. How much is that going to cost? How long is it going to take? And how on earth was the deviation from the CT protocol allowed to happen?! The mind boggles what FARN mngmnt are claiming!! This is not an industry where you can just �fix� things quickly & simply. It just does not work like that. This will be a best a protracted process requiring extensive investigation & repetition quite likely of CT3, and at worst, acknowledgement that quite simply CT 3 was a failure and FARN mngmnt need to accept this. Japan's data/ouctome will be v important but does not negate from the outcomes of this trial. I�ve never heard of any pharma in my life claim there may be an error or similar in CT3 and blame outcomes due to this. Jeez, imagine if the likes of GSK started doing that?!