Member Info for knutsfordnotary

It seems to me to be not unreasonable that a share incentive scheme be put in place so that those who work for the benefit of the company, by digging the stuff up and processing it into profit for the shareholders , should have a share in the progress of the company.I suspect it would not unduly dilute the profits available for distribution to present holders and would encourage application from the workers.

Like death and taxes, the reports will come.
It will be transforming of the view which uninformed outsiders (ie not up to speed with the analysis there has been on this BB)can have of the company in that instead of reporting a paltry loss and nothing stunning, there will be a whacking profit ( and we who know know there is far greater to come) and huge progress made since last report to describe.
If the figures do not absolutely energise the SP I shall eat my entire collection of hats!
Those who have the sense and b**ls to hold will regret exitting , particularly just now , just before lift off
Don't like popcorn , but pass it!!

Thats 11.8 m for BMN
Isn’t it?

Just about to Knuttie. Wateringholetime!

On the other hand , I suppose every sell has a buy and vice versa
Confused.
Roll on the weekend!

You cannot tell because the transactions are misdescribed.
Why?

If I as a notary was as inaccurate in my certificates as LSE's Trade reports are I would be struck off!!
1546 £5000 buy was mine but reported as a sell!
Humph

Wot? No honeymoon?
Great article: as always appreciate your wide coverage of matters affecting BMN

alfa Being from Knutsford=Canute'sford (or as historians have it Knud) Your clue =King 1016 has a surplus a and e before re-arranging the letters for your post! I think if I gave the answer here my post might be removed .FWIW I agree with your post and every word of Knuttie's earlier one

Congrats and felicitations to you and your family. I am about to become a grandfather , all being well and am only worried that the grandmother may not wish to continue to look after the grandfather!Not quite in a bathchair yet though. Thanks to BMN, do Bentley do bathchairs?

Knuttie and his Missus are great pals of mine
The messages of support from you all pretty much reduced this old cynical lawyer to tears when I read them last evening.You are all stars , taking the time and trouble to give support to someone only known to you (mostly)via this board. Your messages meant a lot to me and will have meant a whole lot more to my tubby friend and his long suffering wife!.
How wonderful it is that the generosity of spirit shown by you all will be rewarded most handsomely by the upcoming fantastic performance of the company in which we all share such faith. So I thank you and Fortune for bringing you all together. Onwards together, literally.

Paludina- Catching up on yesterday's posts. I respect and defer to your comment about not being able to use VRFBs in big ships because of the turnaround time.Knowing absolutely nothing about photo-voltaic cells, I wonder whether the large deck area could accommodate a small solar energy farm to re-charge as they go??

some people call Knuttie and me Tweedledum and Tweedldee because we have so frequently said the same thing at the same time , independently of each other !
Had not seen Tweedledum's post when I placed my similar comment

According to that ever so well researched rag, Investors Chronicle (don't they know that SP Angels 25p price target is based on dirt cheap V prices?)-
"IC View
Under this complexity – further obscured by a Madagascan coal power division – could be a highly cash-generative operation. But we’re happy to wait for half-year results for a real sign of Vametco’s earnings before second-guessing house broker SP Angel’s 25p price target. Hold".

Still can't bring myself to cancel the subscription because I want to see what they say when all the news breaks with results publication, but surely the "house broker" should be doing us all a service if they got real about the V price and its impact on the proper SP. Or is there a longer game in play here where the "house broker" is complicit in maintaining a low SP for some ulterior reason. The longer the "house broker" remains silent the more I think of complicity.

last line should have read
So Vote in support......

I do not see what everybody seems worried about.
If you invest in a company you invest in the quality of its management. Have we the slightest doubts about the great management of this company by FM and the BoD? Certainly should not have the slightest.
So, Back them! if they feel the need for an ability to issue further shares, you can bet your bottom dollar that they will only be doing so if they render present investors a significant profit.
So, back them. Who are we and what do we know to contradict heir carefully laid plans?
So, vtein support of those who have rendered you all pretty wealthy so far.

Interesting that UK's National Infrastructure Commission says no to more nuclear generation as Solar and Wind power should be enough for the future . Even though we seem always to have wind around UK I wonder what a hot quiet dry spell like at present would cause? They surely must be looking at VRFB battery storage systems, or if not should be encouraged to do so

Not being well informed on such matters, whereabouts on AIM does a 25p share price put our market cap- top 100, 80, or 150?

Like it!! And if2 died you still have 1 Ho ho

Oops Meant my apology tone to those omitted from mention