Dilution - Completely Unnecessary13 Nov 2018 17:58
I'm not an expert in various financial tools when it comes to raising additional capital but to put it simply (and optimistically assuming that they will rise those 3bln via senior debt and will look for alternative source for the extra $400-600mln):
IF the company, once fully operational, is supposed to generate such a marvellous future profits counted in billions year by year for the next century or so, WHY the hell would they even think of permanently diluting the current holdings of many investors causing PERMANENT damage to future SP and future dividends of the current holders, only for the sake of raising that "small change" of $400-600mln (it is relatively small amount in comparison to projected future turnover / profits of the business)?
Couldn't they just propose some form of debt solution involving existing share holders and giving them a priority of choice and ONLY IF the full amount needed is not obtained, propose an issue of new equity in order to find the remaining amount?
Wouldn't that be more fair to all already involved and allow to raise the same amount in the same time? Just saying.
Forced dilution sound like the worst possible scenario for any LTH. There is absolutely no need for that. I'm sure that many PIs would gladly lend the money to the company they believe in.
I'm not sure about logistics behind that but as a general idea, it's not bad is it?