George Frangeskides, Chairman at ALBA, explains why the Pilbara Lithium option ‘was too good to miss’. Watch the video here.
but 404 message showing - keep trying
Tom please stop engaging in these back and forth exchanges and use filter.
Saves clogging up the board and who needs grief on a day when SP is looking positive with news due in days.
Ask 19.5p
Agree Dip.
Yours the first reply to my post that I can see although from your first paragraph it appears someone else replied first.
My GGP journey is fairy lengthy and I have benefitted from the input of a number of posters - always do my research obviously.
Conclusion is Paddysat was way ahead of the official company drill location updates.
Bamps adds way more colour to the drill results.
More posters also add - Hydrogen’s 10million share buy prediction as well as much more and Reddirt spotting permissions lodged etc etc etc
The key is regularly, the early views of the above posters and others come to fruition via trades/drill updates. This happens often enough combined with my research, to mean I have added more over time.
The LTHs stay the course and their prose is identifiable and distinctive.
The posters I was referring to to be wary of come and go and one can often see a tone of prose and indeed specific phrasing being used by a number of new posters - one could almost think some of them are the same individual opening multiple accounts in different names over time!!!! Well I never.
****Final paragraph should have started;
“Keep posting Bamps…”
On reflection ousting you or trying to is the agenda of some - keep on keeping on mate.
Dropped in and among a litter of green filtered posters I read your continued patient posts as ever including your logic, calculations and research.
I appreciate your work and my only advice is to filter more and engage less.
It can be difficult to weed those seeking conflict for their own ends or to sow doubt and push headings/threads that interrupt debate or impact sentiment.
Entering into two way debate seems futile and indeed is fuel to those fires.
Where there are any doubts re motivation of new joiners who seem to go from nil activity to dozens of posts a day, or longer term provocatuers, I believe that we are at the point now that a reasonable response is to point posters toward NCM or GGP web sites, broker notes/financial articles, a wealth of pinned info in GGP highlights on Telegram, Paddy’s Twitter among others.
Keep ousting Bamps but share your developing thinking rather than battling people who can’t be bothered to do their research or are looking for conflict.
All the best.
Ducks aligning ahead of expected catch up drill results to be reported next week
Yep the body of the ad sets it out -
“You’ll assist in the development of an underground mining team capable of leading the next stages of mining at Havieron and show demonstrated experience managing underground contractors as well as all aspects of an underground mine.”
That’ll be a mine then………
https://www.newcrest.com/careers/current-opportunities
The Havieron Project has enjoyed exploration success over the past year and is rapidly approaching the delivery of an initial resource.
I’ve had 007 filtered for some while and hence missed whatever that poster put up this time around.
Just wanted to add my appreciation Bamps for the countless hours you put in to provide an informative view of drills results/ construction planning and progress etc.
Keep up the great work and thank you again Bamps.
Notrader.
Me - "I would appreciate your evidence that I present any of my posts as the view of other posters"
You -“Well, perhaps the phrase "For the sake of the rest of us please filter." might suggest that.”
For the sake of the rest of us is my view.
The rest of us think/feel/want/don’t want etc would have been me presenting my view as that of others.
If you want this debate please pick a fight more carefully.
I’ll leave it there thanks.
Notrader straight in with the mallet.
Thank you for taking the time to invest in me via your feedback, albeit partially researched to back your point.
If you wish to be more diligent check all my posts and spot the one I changed my approach and even mentioned that I had previously fallen for the temptation of attempting to convince a persistent disrupter or two and to no avail.
I do take offence to your portrayal of me as a “ self appointed bouncer” as my post did not call for removal of another poster.
I would appreciate your evidence that I present any of my posts as the view of other posters let alone “all here”.
Finally, isn’t your post a rather more abrasively toned version what you seem to find unacceptable in my post i.e. having and expressing an opinion on a public board.
Take care as some here will interpret you as a self appointed bouncer speaking for all.
With multiple posters engaging in ongoing exchanges with “Colin” those who have filtered this poster suffer a disrupted board.
Surely by now it is clear to you, no explanation/attempted put down/ instruction to walk or change nappy or do research is going to stop “Colin” from posting.
On the contrary, every response validates the post that you were intended to bite on and so they keep coming.
For the sake of the rest of us please filter.
The responders are becoming as irritating as the trolls .
Who says there is a “funding hurdle”?
Who knows the total investment requirement from NCM and GGP?
Bigger the orebody, higher the investment to extract it ( I am in favour of a huge Tier 1 find with associated investment requirement ).
Tier 1 find.
Tier 1 jurisdiction.
Tier 1 JV partner.
Investment required as low as one could hope to find with Telfer 45km away a in need of ore to survive.
That’s it from me on this as your early contributions are already similar to previous subtle ( at first) de rampers.
Keep researching the answers are in the public domain across LSE/Twitter/Telegram group and countless broker notes/ company updates and interviews.
Ar1 if you can show how I was rude then I am happy to apologise.
ARoberrs1 - really?
Sandeep Biswas explicitly states as part of this RNS that “……. our objective is to continue
utilising the Telfer plant without interruption as we look to introduce Havieron……”
The RNS states - ” The Newcrest Board has approved A$246 million (~US$182 million(1)) of funding for the cutback and Newcrest has entered into a contract for the works to be undertaken. “
Do you seriously question that Havieron is going to be mined????????
Some sensitivity that I maybe seeking some kudos from original post. Not looking to achieve any more than rebalancing what were negative general posts with facts from prior PR.
The verbatim comments were taken from a longer piece by JC on Telegram group.
The remainder were my thoughts/ interpretation.
Hopefully this clarification appeases those more concerned to nitpick process rather than appreciate the positive intent in support of the GGP investment case.
Deary me…..
Fair enough Shark - you seem one to watch
That you Jvetch?
* grammes per vertical metre
** ref’s to Sandeep’s