Member Info for katstrangler

I see that they placed £2.5million in Jan, which is roughly $3.4million.

so holders will have to make up their own minds as to how much bake and Metapay cost as that, will be the growth in profits? so make up a number...

what i note was retail offer was oversubscribed in Jan from £250k to £500k.

this Treasury offer bought in much less, at a much lower price... i think retailers are weary of low sp with nothing pushing it higher yet.

you can only keep enthusiasm going for buying with a raised sp. not seeing it yet, even with a Treasury and guesses as to how many btc they'll buy. we'll have to see if the '9x' progress continues.

Why are you ALWAYS looking to blame mms for fluctuations in the sp. if there were sufficient buyers to take all the sells then the price would rise. OR you could ramp the drop by using the usual trope of 'mm's picking up shares to sell higher soon...'

there are holders who have shares coming to them at 1.2 so can sell their existing shares at current level as, whatever their in, they have them cheaper at 1.2.

unless the update is VERY good, to make the sp move way past the volume of sellers it'll just wobble about but with another £2million's worth in retail hands.

happy to see this ramped to the high heavens... but be nice to see thsoe bitcoins actually in the kitty... instead of more delays.

I think there are more than enough 0.1 shares out there to suppress the price until something comes along to make the sp jump.

investors can't keep saying 'it's being held down' as if there's a nefarious plan by a large group wanting to make easy cash... they're already out there... and selling every time the sp gets to 0.3.

Their argument is that they should never have let it be bought at all without a KIID and so now they're a bit frightened about it being highlighted so are now being heavy handed with it.

(to be fair, there IS now a bit of a web of buying stakes in companies owned by the same people and then those companies buying into other similarly owned companies... there IS something a wee bit sniffy about it but the consolidation and change of certification will help clear things.

You daft spd. AHS. 'clever'? you'll be telling me next that they planned the fall from 1.9 and have been planning this for the last six months!

BoD read about it the same time as we did and have been busy colbbling together a placing at whatever price they could get.

now, if there's a TR1 in that raise, then great (though still say looking at what's being raised by others atm. £2mill is... and they still should have bought at the time of the Treasury rns - oh, sorry, they bought that 1bitcoin... wtf was that about!

s[ was higher in the hope of news just a few days ago when it hit 1.5 so still a lonnnnng way to go for the sp. and, whatever the next btc buy is for (it'll need to be for more than £2mill otherwise, what was the point of pre-advertising their cash?) just hope the interims support the optimism.

glad everyone had a better day, though...

A bit suspicious, too.

if you want to trade in #TIR without any obstacles general opinion is IG... and the more people tell ii that, the more... they probably couldn't care less!

While it's not a great cost in the grand scheme of things (if this is going to bag) all their telephone transactions cost £50 on top of the usual charges...

Robert, the only question i have is with 3. we aren't holding atm.. i await how much of the reserves will be sunk into btc.

interesting, though, also, that all the other pillars are now almost sidelined, as far as information is concerned. if only ALL the pillars had as much information to discuss as this funding for btc.

They'll probably tweet brag about how they've bought (still don't get why they only bought the 1btc if they had that cash?) 5 whole new BTC and then talk about another 'maybe' acquisition.

interesting that they only now talk about cash position, maybe days away from interims? so they obviously CAN provide more info... so then the question is why now? also, i'm pretty sure they could have also included in this rns 'and we've bought 40more btc' instead of waiting for yet another, possibly disappointing, rns telling us how many they've bought.

most companies seem to announce the funds and buy at the same time!

gotta say, the next time this gets ramped successfully, i'll happily sell my shares to anyone who wants them...

He's full of it... says he's invested, then says he got out... but he's still invested... but he's OUT!

he's either in a hole, like the rest of the heavily invested or he was bs ramping on the spike while getting out.

either way, hardly a indicator of the success of the company!

I remain to be pleasantly surprised. but i think it's going to be another 'as managedment expected' update.

still, if they buy 40btc then it'll show the year's workmanlike effort won't have been wasted. be nice to think a TR1 would present itself from the fundraise, to show HNWI interest but... fingers crossed!

Lloyd. by my reckoning, they've got £3million in cash, two of which came from the earlier placing... they had a bit from previous... so they're up... £1million proffit?

I'd read my post before yours, Lloyd as i think there are some convenient bouts of amnesia present.

Only hope for this share in the short term, to stop it wallowing in the low 1s for another year is they buy £4million's worth and then talk up a bloody good rest of the year as the results won't be pretty!

If the sp doesn't move higher then the counter will be 'but the company has progressed so much in 3 years... it's nothing like the company it was' which, while true will mean... ???

be interesting to see whether the WRAP was taken up or, heavens to Betsy, increased, due to over-subscription! whatever the outcome, it will show what the sentiment is atm. doesn't say what the interims will be like but it's fair to say that a proportion of us will be wrong-footed, one way or another!

What's funny is, as i have shares in #TIR from the transfer from Jarvis, they're happy to send me details of the AGM and an push to vote but they won't let me add?

still think Bixby should have said something by now about this situation.

and have to ask if the change in name will mean a change in document requirement and the ban in buying? without that i don't see how the sp can move forward.

I think it would help if the company did things like Investormeets, podasts or gave more clues or progress reports on each of their assets to prevent doom-mongering.

have we any further clues on each of the individual pillars since the last historical update? there's the reason...

It was the first... it had excellent communications... it has a recognised player in the market... and it has raised £hundreds of millions... just like #TAO/#SATS, which is only just starting, has a $100million private cln in its current plan.

it isn't the owning of BTC that makes things jump, it's the pr, the tactics and the implied position it has... i think it's fair to say that #GST doesn't have the pr, the BoD, the exposure or even the name, that it gets put into the same basket/league as the others.

expect a workmanlike update... if you're lucky it'll bag, if you're unlucky, it'll lose whatever rise comes from buying 20 more btc (or more if they had more than £110k in the kitty).

but without some stunning proof that this is a company where all the pillars are going to be very visible, very profitable and take advantage of these licences it keeps getting from unheard of companies, then we'll be talking about moving up from 1.6 in a year's time!

Thee are a few that think nothing of being abusive... then they attract abuse back... they're the trouble makers, who can't have a reasonable conversation with anyone with a contrarian opinion.

their motto is 'go for the man, not the ball'.

whatever opinion is published, noone should have to endure insults. says something about the character...

CLAI isn't up... it's the spread! you only have to pull back to the monthly chart to see it's slipping.

CLAI rns for 2.5BTC was a joke... (but not quite the joke that 1bitcoin was!)