Member Info for katstrangler

What's interesting Aud, is posters always talk about their own personal situation and then imply it's universal. i seriously doubt more than 5% of holders have averages at 0.77 and many that HAD that average will also have averaged UP at 2p+ because noone hardly ever just sits on their low average when they think the share is a littery ticket to fortune.

i suspect most who talk about having low averages are very selective in what number they post here... i wouldn't mind hazarding a guess that even you are massaging the truth about an average of ony 0.77. but, if there's truth in that then more fool you for having held in the 3s without considering trading out in case of a dip...

trouble with all posts here are there unverifiable... so folk read the ramps when they're actially wanting a rampy good rns because... as the song goes, 'any dream will do'.

if the share does well on results then i'm fine and so is everyone else... if the share doesn't then i'll have to reconsider... but it's fair to say that, if the share does badly and one has a below 1p average then you'll still be okay and so post positively... but i doubt there are many who will see it similarly.

personally, i am fearful that any company that raises on an rns and then doesn't complete the transactions they've said they will are being economical with the truth... or, at least, whatever weird timeframe they have that they feel they can raise and not complete.

just bad company practice, esp. with bitcoin having risen 15% since their initial rns.

but, no, i'm not overstretched, just annoyed that the balanced story isn't told here and the very few with good averages feel able to ride the bb easily.

Aud, you get he's 'funny' defending a falling sp? your cheery disposition comes at the expense of a falling sp.

not sure that's something to be laughing over... moreso if the next update doesn't deliver.

Being a depository doesn't add value in and of itslef... the company can't leverage deposits like a bank does... it's always going to be volatility of the asset that will generate better revenue...

it's not clever to decide on the either/or... and, for now, it's the Treasury that is of interest... it's why they rns'd!

Just responding to Bubble, who said he needed 2.5 - 3p to break even... and pointing out that this probably be 2.2 at consolidation... no idea what his average is but i think his calcs are the ones that are skew...

Enki, you should have waited for the shares to go live, there are going to be a few who think this ain't the deal it should be, not having announced any bitcoin buys yet (unless they announce them over next few days). with the spread and brokers wanting their cut i really won't be surprised to see 1.1 again.

doesn't really matter as i won't be adding but i'll keep my own fingers crossed that the results do what the rampier types hope for.

'WE' don't trade them... the clients do... the volume we hold is inconsequential, aside from the very small fees taken from their selling... just like the brokers folk here repeatedly whine about... except our fees are fixed on transaction.

have no clue why you keep trying to fluff up the bitcoin saga here... 'we' own 1 bitcoin. and that's it... as to when the placing is used to buy... any, is anyone's guess and will have no bearing on the sp unless they publish the news. but, as folk here are so keen to 'think', if they're not going to publish the buys then there's no point in announcing they were going to have a Treasury... all they've done is dilute the total further, but at a eve more terrible price than the last placing!

Nut the consolidation WILL make it 2p ish... that's not going to help you, though as you'll have 90% fewer shares. do you not get consolidation?

3p will help but only if your current average is 0.3... if you bought the spike then you'll be needing 5p+ to see a profit.

And, yes, 'they' are all paid trolls who have been on said mission for the past 3 years. if that WERE the case then i'd be a lott wealthier from that job than holding this share atm...

just reminding you that BoD paid 2p 3 years ago...

You can be in a share and bloody hate their indifference to releasing appropriate news or updates because you don't want to cash in a loss and just wish they'd do the right thing instead of treating shareholders (majority shareholders, mind, as there are STILL no history of TR1s showing any major investors in this) and hoping that pointing that out might create a groundswell to start a move to getting BoD to play with a straight bat...

gotta be better than constantly talking about 10 > 250p while seeing the sp still sitting at 1.3 after raising £2.25million at 1.9 and then £2.1mill at 1.2 and not seeing any progress on any of the missing news...

That's how it is now unless you join up with a monthly fee...

Massive, you seem to have lost your zen attitude of the past few weeks and back to your usual aggresive posting... must be frustrating to keep pumping the copany and yet them not playing ball by releasing the right info...

must be my turn to be zen...

If someone wants to explain why BoD STILL haven't commented on AJBell, ii and others cautioning against buying (or, at least putting big obstacles in the way) the sp is going to keep struggling and we can now see both punters who fancied a go and 0.1 holders getting rid. i guess a 100% profit is still a good trade... not as good as 500% from a couple of weeks back but... until Bixby explains the situation instead of the silence, is anything going to change post-AGM? and the rampier posters are still trying to keep the price up to sell into.

bit of a mess, really and only serves to add weight to the brokers' position.

Without proof of what everyone is speaking we just get spikes... remember the euphoria of 3.6 in december? that was based on... what, exactly?

the difference here is the results that have been waited on for 3months now, with daily 'i think's talking about a rise... and now we're at... 1.32?

if that's your interpretation of 'good times' then we have different opinions of that and the company should be doing better to engender a better sp.

and it still beggars belief that they don't feel an obligation to update on the treasury rns, having placed for it.

First, i keep tabs on the sp so can see the size of the trades and their frequency... and as GST promised 200x their original investment and added rocket emojis to integration, i'm surprised they don't do more to 'like' the ramps.

but they really could do more than click like... if that's the evidence we have to go on for future rises...

agree bake is doing well to publicise its endeavours... but as that's only six months old in the assets box, what about the other pillars doing something similar for businesses as they've had years for that to promote itself. will be fascinating to understand what, exactly Wellesly has done for the company, aside from making some extra for himself!

a shame bake couldn't have done an rto of gst as they have the better handle on how to make a fist of pr. i hope the company is learning from that experience.

You really ARE a whinly l'li ....... first you complain when i post, then you complain when i don't.

you're just a little bit obsessed... and desparate for some good news to finally validate all the thousnds and thousands of rampy posts you've written on here over... 18months.

personally, looking forward to the sp rising too... which it would if the company would play with a straight bat... ad that's be relief to may others here who get antsy that the sp isn't doing what they want... anyway, leave you to the company excuses.

Massive, don't be a tool. folk have other things to do beside sit endlessly on the bb reading posts, like some lthers do...

and i'd say it was a bed'n'ISA as it pretty much had zero effect on the sp, other than encouraging others to start buying and pushing the price up a little... not bothered by that... and still think it's weak how many 'think' or have 'opinions' that GST don't need to publish such price sensitive information as their first actualy buy for their treasury, the treasury they felt was important enough to announce... if it WERE true that they've bought (keep repeating it, rampers) then it shows a shocking misunderstanding as to what is potentially price senstivie news... now, on to other things...

AI supercomputer owners don't need to rent space/assets from third party providers to run their stuff... don't be so bloody stupid!

Admit it, AHS, your '50 bitcoins bought' is major bs atm... and, to be fair, GST started it...

Sorry, Aud... it was another new poster who said they will trade without rnsing... i was pointing out to them that there are always rns' where companies trade their own shares or block list...

Aud, you're doing what we all do... justifying the lack of comms so we can hope they've bought 50 even though they've only announced 1.

no doubt the WILL buy them at some point but this idea that GST don't have to take their legal responsibilities except in their own time or only on six monthlies is why they're being dicks... and that affects the sp. opinions are not a great store of info... we've seen that far too often: Sandbox, stablecoin, easysend, bonfirepay, integration, Wellesley trades... the company's not so hard up they can't rns a Treasury pruchase... it's their actual statement of their intention.