Member Info for katstrangler

But i don't mean it the way you do!

Nope... not cliff edge but not the 'making lots of money from all the pillars', either.

as there wasn't a spike in the sp pre placing have to hope it was an 'in' for pals before a good rns that doubles the mcap.

can't see the point of raising on a poor sp unless that's the case? but wouldn't shovel any more of my own cash into this until they prove they know what they're doing. i now don't like the fact that it seems to be tied up with a close knit family group without any really notable names in the crypto field. in fact, Hosp is the only notable name that people have heard of.

and i still can't get over the fact that their other assets are completely invisible to holders, who've never used it, never speak of it, never seen an ad for it...

there are shadier companies out there but at least there's a chance of making good cash while they hoodwink folk!

Nope. i don't have faith that the results will be good.

and i think the raise is too little for btc and too much for other resources.

i already hold so will be happy to see this rising again but i'll hold off buying in case the results hurt more than expected.

The 'adults' have been buying at 3.2, 2.7, 2.1, 1.9, 1.5, 1.3 and now 1.18.

some adults shouldn't have debit cards! if only they had a gas meter equivalent for buying shares...

They literally hold 1 BTC in assets. the rest aren't theirs... they should have bought £2million's worth with the Treasury rns and said at the time it felt like they'd expose their cash position if they bought piddling amount... guess 1btc was the piddling amount!

if they'd raised £10million for BTC THEN, and bought 100btc we'd have been impressed. this just sounds like lack of understanding of markets, of crypto, of funding, of how to operate what they have. also explains why they never post anything about the company's progress in social media.

They (well, i) don't gloat at the sp dropping, i get angry at the repeat ramping by a certain few, instead of having mature conversations about the state of play.

dialogue is meant to be accurate, not just ramping and not just trolling. but when all the posts are 'this will fly' without any real basis for it then it gets countered with trolling.

in the end, though, the sp tells you what you need to know!

Gla.

What, from their 1 bitcoin Treasury holding!?!

farcical, really. making money hand over fist but have to raise to cover bitcoin purchase (trust they're not placing £1.5million to cover their £110k purchase!)

Can't get a 1.2 placing away if the sp's falling.

only hope is that they're not being cynical about their actions and that results will be better than is now worryingly expected.

certainly wouldn't be selling at this point as the spread will chop your legs from under you but God knows what the price will be by August.

but have to admit, that farcical Tone Goh tweet about buying 1 btc was mental, considering it was in closed period. might as well have written 'found a penny'!

Nm.

No big fan of this share but no need for slightly deranged posting.

suggest he needs admin counselling... can folk report the various posts, as i've done, as i'm a bit concerned about his well-being.

And, maybe for swallowing the rampy talk on here over the months.

At 1.2 the share now has support, mainly because people can NOW see that they didn't have enough in cash to make a decent fist of buying btc.

beyond thick of Goh to bang on in twitter about buying 1btc before the markets open and then rns another dropped price placing.

only 'good' news is they couldn't have really sold into a spike because it was barely there...

placing to shore up the cash reserves so they can buy btc AND still have cash in the bank.

coin toss whether they have good results (though with only a couple of weeks to go it DOES sound like we're going to get an 'as management expected' rns and talking about good times for the next year!)

hold, if you can because there won't be a spike before results... might see a dip with results... then folk go in with talk about Semnet trippling mcap and all the usual 'range of tools' which, atm, look like the only 'tools' in GST are on this bb.

half expect massive and AHS to load up again (be mad if they did) on the post result lows and talk their own book again... pretty much what they've accused 'certain people' of doing all this time! OR they just disappear, like splatted did... maybe Enki takes up the ramping cudgels!

Nothing more to say...

Certainly don't see 1 btc adding 50% to the sp tomorrrow. don't know why Goh didn't just buy half a btc himself and then store it in bake and make himself some profit!.

have no idea if there'll be an rns in the morning but if they don't make some statement about their plan for how and why they take whatever path they've decided on, i fail how to see this doesn't just come across as copycat action?

how on earth does 1btc reflect "the GST Directors' confidence in Bitcoin's ability to reduce counterparty and exchange rate risk, while potentially enhancing shareholder value beyond the Group's core operations."

The $36million contract would be impressive if something was known about it, considering the total stated revenue from the year previous was about $2.2mill?

i don't think the company did anything to the company to enhance it so is there anything to say that the contract wasn't, in fact, an internal but 'separate' entity that might have been an over-valued contract? OR that $35.5million of it is just costs with a miniimal profit?

i always thought it amazing that one contract is rns'd but nothing else sine? so they're so amazing they x15 their previous revenue with one contract but never get any other work?

and the value of the contract matches the stake held by the company??? bit coincidental or what?

Odd to be the subject of posts again... so, to clarify.

2p or 1.8 or 2.5 or 3p. depending on what the news is i'll happily ride the wave... i'm not stupid enough to say 'i'm selling at 2p regardless... BUT i have strong reservations about what the update will say but i expect it to be a spike and i'm certainly not going to wait until 2026 to reap whatever rewards lthers SAY they will wait on... too many folk now see the spikes in this, which is why even 1.5 saw a retrace.

if the sp DOESN't break 2p i'll be annoyed, considering the ramping that'll happen about 'right company, right space' just like folk have been saying since stablecoin was the buzzword in every post (those were the days, eh!)

would love to sell at 3p and i could easily sell too early. but the good thing here is that their silences are guaranteed to allow boredom to set in. so, whatever the spike (and the higher the better) the bigger the retrace. so eill nr VERY happy for see mm's punt 5p as an opening price on a good rns but ask yourself, what does the rns need to say for that to happen?

aside from all that, have a lovely weekend, all, whatever your persuasion on the future here...

Leew, i add and sell a trading pot... but i still have my original holding of 500k. it has, at times, been 1.5mill... it's currently 800k.

i would like to think that the news will be good but i'd prefer to see a BTC rise before the update.

if it's going to get a bump, i'd prefer BTC assets to be real rather than intended, before the BTC price rises another 10% and then see the rise from support at... 1.8?

the company almost aid the spikes by keeping news so secretive (for example, can there really have been nothing to say about Semnet until end of July?)

Won't be surprised to see 0.2... (and i say that having bought from 0.29 down). if it's to buy then sp will have to be a tad lower... but share will need a news spike to give funders a way to sell at a big ol' profit without waiting for the SWC copy!

Again, you're lucky to buy in after the clns crushed the holders already in. or the repeat placings for things that don't materialise... like the £847k placing for 'maybe acquisitions' that became Easysend a week or two later and then didn't happen. Where did the placings money go?

too often their silences hide some failures... and it's really interesting that bake, an asset only recently bought, has more of a profit than all the other 'pillars' put together.

i've been in this since the new BoD and assumed that 2p would be the low, if that was their buy in.

i wish you luck with your lucky timings... if it goes well for you then it also goes well for me and i recover and better my original investment. but i don't consider 3 years as being a 'shiny thing' period. maybe by 2027 thing will be infinitely better... be nice if they try and explain what 'time to time' means, as far as logic of not buying in yet with Treasury rns?