Let's try to be civil20 May 2022 09:46
Whatever your opinion on the company, be it good or bad, we are all here to make money, some will do it by trading, some by holding long and possibly even averaging up to hold more, whatever the game, we are all here to make money. I don't care if people have a negative opinion of Jubilee, so long as they back it up with facts. Homey IS entitled to his opinion and on some points he is right. We were promised no more dilution, but we got more dilution. Yes, it cleared all the historic debt and yes it was known about debt, so technically no more NEW shares were issues, but it was still a dilution after no more dilution was supposed to happen and YES, we will be in a better place once we know WHO is taking over as Chairman, personally I hope it is a big name, but we shall see.
Additionally I agree with most of the rest of you. I think that we are on the cusp of becoming a billion+ pound company in short order and that this industry that we have in effect made our own will become one worth tens of billion pounds a year, and we might even see our share price towards a pound and over, without a consolidation, if we stay a company that doesn't get bought out for our tech and expertise.
However, regardless of what people say about the company, both good and bad, let's try to keep it civil this board is a good board, now a certain someone has left it alone and we should welcome ALL opinions because all opinions are valid.
If you want proof I went to an AGM of a little AIM company who mine tungsten in Spain. I listened to the Chairman and was throughly enthused by the sales pitch. Later on, I got chatting with a REALLY rich guy who was looking to invest in the company and the chairman was keen to have him on board, so the chairman wandered over and they began chatting and the rich guy was asking REALLY probing questions, such as what happens if this and what happens if that. It was stuff that I, honestly hadn't thought of, such as the weather and flooding, etc. We'd done a shed load of research and found out that flooding occurred on occasion. The chairman seemed non plussed by these questions and just said everything had a plan without really elaborating. Anyway, it rranspired that there was a lot of rain and the water dam flooded and prevented the company getting to the good ROM for a long time, efficiencies were terrible, etc and they didn't make anywhere near the levels they proposed they'd make. Luckily I had sold out of the company on a bit of a spike and made a bit of money, but not a whole lot for the amount of time I held those shares. The company in question is now on a suspension, so YES, both positive and negative posts and opinions are healthy for a company, so long as they are backed up by facts rather than just a negative effort trying to make something happen for your own gain.