RE: Hello15 Aug 2018 23:42
Pete,
There's two ways of investing in professionally managed funds. "Unit Trusts", and "Investment Trusts". Unit Trusts are rubbish charges wise, the broker typically charges you a percentage of the total holdings each year to hold them in your trading account, that's on top of management fees within the fund... it adds up to a lot over the years.
Investment Trusts are better (in my opinion and I'm not a Financial Adviser so do your own research) Investment Trust operate just like a publicly listed company, you can buy and sell them just like buying shares in any other company. The charges are incorporated into the fund without you have to make sure you have a monthly amount to pay the broker.
The broker typically charges you the same management charge as holding any other stock. And the best bit about them is, when the market tanks the Investment Trust manager doesn't have to see investments in order to pay you. You just do an instant quote and decide on whether or not to deal just like any other stock.
Because of this, and the charges being less... they typically significantly out perform Unit Trusts in the same sector, and even the Unit Trust version of them with the same fund manager.
Obviously past performance is not guarantee of future returns, but one of the best performing sectors appear to be UK Smaller Companies, Biotech and Technology funds. I won't be buying Biotech or Tech funds because they often sit doing almost nothing for years and then suddenly rocket on new developments... the growth is not regular.
The UK Smaller Companies grow provided their underlying bench marks grow, and they usually significantly outperform the FTSE 100 and 250. Obviously when there's a big sell of on markets they drop just as fast too, but no more than the likes of Glencore has in the past.
The best thing about them is you get decent growth without the need to obsess over trading. All investment funds will tell you, you need to be willing to invest for at least 5 years. Obviously if you buy at the top of the market it could tank and then take 5 years just to break even, with the 6th and 7th years onward making you a packet.
300 to 400% (or more) is not unusual over a 10 year period. That might sound like too long, but the likelihood of anyone making that sort of return across their entire investment pots is very unlikely without taking excessive risk and getting lucky.
Obviously Glencore managed this, but when it was under 100p no one could be certain it wouldn't go bankrupt. It obviously didn't but you never know. At least with investment trusts if one or two companies in it completely die a death... it's not going to screw your happiness because it's diversified.