RE: Billingham - planning?1 Jun 2026 18:28
Agree the funding stack will likely be lined up (not signed or announced) before planning in this case, but it is not common for planning consent to be a CP to FID (maybe it can be but I’ve never seen or heard of this in 8+ years of energy PE, although happy to be proved wrong in this case). Planning is a development workstream and a major de-risking milestone, hence why they applied for planning early on the previous site and received it well ahead of FID. TVL is in an unusual position compared to most infra projects because of the change in location relatively late in the programme. It is however common for there to be planning conditions to be discharged as a CP to first drawdown (discharge of conditions isn’t needed for FID), which is different to the consent itself being outstanding. As previously mentioned, I think planning is low-risk, but it is outstanding for now.
Good points on Government grant/guarantee and NWF, they can absolutely come in sooner and I hope they do.