Member Info for Jonmo91

Not too happy with the weeks shenanigans. Guess he has a fair idea who’s playing the games.

Would the testing need to be done prior to choosing the location of that drill or would they have enough information from the last one?

Perhaps it’s already begun. MOU4 was ahead of schedule, yesterdays information released just a couple of days after the initial one could have been released as one RNS if they were happy to release it.

The attack on the share price might have forced PRDs hand which is what some posters were asking for.

If any hostility is coming it’s likely to be before testing. I’d have thought once testing starts PG will be able to run enough interference until the results are known. Testing to start in the coming weeks gives any potential acquirer a collapsing timeframe to try something cheap.

As always, we’ll find out one way or another at some point.

Seems a few new posters trying to get momentum to pressure PRD to release information prior to the testing, which is to start soon anyway.

Probably in no way related to GRH comment yesterday.

when i said markets, that’s too much of a compliment. i meant bulletin boards and ****e write ups. the man is a shambles.

TW has been a stain on the markets for years.

You can’t second guess trying to trade swings here. Got to be less stressful holding for results. Each to their own. Exciting times.

Thanks

I didn’t have an epiphany after MOU3. I’ve been critical of PG in the past regarding governance. It’s been improved since the turn of the year and I have acknowledged that.

It wasn’t actually aimed at you.

Morning GRH. Is it unwanted due to perceived early bid value or because it would be prior to testing and an unwanted distraction?

Both sides are well at it. Would be naive to think otherwise.

I’ve always been in until at least the results. They are coming relatively soon. Ignore the noise.

Testing has been planned for months. All the admin should be done. They should be in a position to press the button as soon as they want.

Why wasn’t they constrained on MOU3 if that was the case, there was even an interim update that wasn’t required on the unexpected gas find.

Or the RNS is as has been written with no hidden messages.

When there’s gas like MoU3 the company wasn’t afraid to bang the drum. Now there’s no mention the inference is it’s because they can’t say anything. Maybe they have just said what they have.

Get testing and see what we have is the next move.

They were upbeat at MOU3, no reason to play MOU4 down, if it’s just given them information about the next drill so be it. Yesterdays drop nothing to do with CHAR. Get the testing done and look at the next drill after that.

Seems a strange move if competition. PRD will release what they have in the next month or so. Hopefully that’s more than the domestic market can take. With PRD being ahead how do they expect to quickly monetise if the market is already fully supplied by PRD by the time they are up and running. Seems they could have made that decision after our results.

The price action prior to news means little. Someone can be dumping with a related party picking them up as smaller buys the other side with all the other sells the dumping generates. Or it could be bad news. You’re either in for the results or not. A month or two we’ll know either way.

13.16 to sell HL half decent amount. It’s moving back up.