Member Info for jollyspeculator

(versus ufg, say)...not entirely sure about management ...but that's enough good stuff for Jolly aaoo/dyor

clearly disappointed punters.. ...where will base form? ...25p looks too low on cashflow multiples (but not on premium to book), so somewhere between here and there for Jolly top up lol aaoo/dyor

but is this ready for orbit??

nothing certain with this fruity one lol

..

I think you are basically right that mml has some low cost deposits (and avm has struggled with its cost management it seems...just my amateur read)... ...but all is not entirely rosy in mml's garden (contractor difficulties; Philippine regs/taxs etc etc) ...best of luck with whatever you decide!!

with such high all-in costs.. ...better value elsewhere in goldieland imv (AAZ/MML) ...from my (not particularly Jolly ) perspective, the focus on cash is misguided...I would look at current assets minus total liabilities for companies in distress...my calcs (pls check) put that "base" at less than 50p/share...somewhere between here and there may be bottom for the sp (but I would want to see decent trend reversal before investing) ...and even that possible "bottom" may depend on pog not crashing through US$1000/oz ..if pog does craters, what is abg's future? why not a serious net net (ie below CA minus all liabilities)?? all aoo/dyor/gl all

solo rocket lol ...enjoy the rugby

spot on

nice one..

unlike last year when there was a confluence of positive effects in the second half, this year is proving very much more challenging...sub 50p is my top up point now!

in e-post? ..don't know ...I find spe's approach to its capital structure and us humble PIs baffling

if such g* investment, why no BoD buying?

so I'll blow with the wind

12p now to sell, my friend...view from naughty step still cloudy

On what basis do you "understand"?...are you creating unfounded rumour?.. ..not lol..are you shorting?

..

..

Brian Emslie, Chairman of Image Scan, commented: "Having become profitable within the last 18 months, the loss reported in the interim results is particularly disappointing. This has occurred partly due to the flow of orders during the year being unevenly phased, with orders intake during the last three months of £1.5m being double that of the previous six. In addition an exceptional loss of £112,000 on the latter stages of the nuclear contract has been realised within the period. In the light of the first half trading performance and the repositioning of the Company towards standard product sales where costs can be better controlled, the Board has revisited the level of resourcing required and has restructured the business to streamline operations. This incurred a further exceptional charge of £25,000 in the period, but has reduced ongoing overheads by around 20%, at which level the Board is confident that the Company should be able to achieve profitability on a sustainable basis. However, the loss in the period coupled with the need to build for stock has made cash flow management challenging. The Board is actively looking at ways to provide further working capital to properly develop the business and to fund new product development. I would like to take this opportunity to thank Ian Johnson, who is standing down from the Board as of today, for over 11 years of invaluable service to the Company."

Operational highlights: · H1 revenue evenly balanced across both our core sectors · FlatScan sales continue to underpin security revenue · Sales of standard industrial systems to both new and existing customers Post period end events: · Orders since the period end exceed £1.5m including: o Repeat sales of SVXi, small vehicle x-ray inspection systems o Multiple unit FlatScan-TPXi sale into the Middle East o Sales of MDXi, industrial inspection systems to a new European customer · Total new orders for year to date of £2.3m (2012: £2.1m) having opened with £0.4m (2012: £2.1m) giving cumulative orders in current financial year of £2.7million · Ian Johnson to step down as non-executive director after over 11 years of service