A mull....8 Nov 2017 06:10
As we all know valuing a Co is not an exact science, many companies trade nowhere near their fundamentals. Sentiment, perception, sectors, AIM or otherwise all play their part in valuing a business. I've picked two companies I'm fairly familiar with, both have similar nos of shares in issue are leaders in their field and are valued within £5m of each other but in different industries so not strictly comparable. However on just one metric and the most important imo Ideagen retains c.30p of every pound re'cd the other co retains only c.5p. So what you might say but seen from this viewpoint it's obvious which co performs better for shareholders yet the mrk cap is almost the same. Too problematic to discover why the 5p Co is rated as highly as the 30p one but which one would you want to buy? At face value you'd think the 5p Co is hugely over valued or perhaps Idea is undervalued, who knows? That's the quandry that pis face. The more you delve into figs & comparisons the more confused you become. A much more savvy investor than myself looked at the top line and the bottom line over a 5 yr period if he liked what he saw he bought. Ok I've simplified that a tad but look for what a Co retains and you won't go far wrong.....well that's the idea!