ST latest7 Oct 2014 15:03
Shares in Aim-traded Thalassa
(THAL: 116p) fell 8 per cent yesterday and have now lost more than one third of their value since the marine seismic equipment provider issued a revenue warning at the time of its half year results in mid-September ('Thalassa sinks on revenue warning', 17 September 2014). At the time I noted that it would take time for investor confidence to return, but concluded that the investment case was strong enough to warrant maintaining my buy recommendation even though the shares had retreated to my original buy tip price of 138p ('Potential for seismic gains', 19 March 2013).
As far as I can ascertain, the latest share price sell-off is down to an announcement made by the company on Friday morning regarding the relocation of its operations to a resplendent Grade II-listed property, Eastleigh Court, near Warminster. The property is located 20 miles from the city of Bath. Thalassa has taken a 10-year lease on 10,000 sq ft of office space at Eastleigh Court. This is hardly 'new' news as the company had already announced its planned relocation in a trading update in July.
However, what would appear to have unnerved some investors is that Eastleigh Court was purchased by chairman and 12.5 per cent shareholder Duncan Soukup on 11 July through his own company Eastleigh Court Limited, so is a related party transaction through Aim rules. There was no mention of this separate transaction in the July trading update, nor for that matter in Thalassa's half-year results in mid-September. In fact, it only came to light in Friday's RNS announcement that confirmed that the company had entered a 10-year lease on the property on Thursday, 1 October.
A related party transaction
The property had been marketed by property firm Knight Frank in February this year at an asking price of £1.25m and the estate agent had invited final bids for the property by a deadline of 25 April. The National Trust had previously used the 13,400 sq ft premises as offices. In other words, Thalassa will be paying £120,000 of rent for a 10-year lease on around three quarters of the freehold property.
The directors, other than Mr Soukup by reason of his interest in the property, consider that the terms of these leases "are fair and reasonable in so far as its shareholders are concerned". They consulted with WH Ireland, Thalassa's nominated adviser, when making this decision. Graham Cole, a non-executive director of Thalassa said: "We are delighted to have entered into the leases on this new campus which was chosen after an extensive search throughout the South West of England. The location and proximity to major transportation hubs will be key to attracting new staff and to maintaining the company's growth over the coming years."
That may indeed be the case, but the obvious question shareholders will be asking themselves is why didn't Thalassa simply buy the property itself? The company had a low yielding cash pil