Member Info for jmfw

Quote contained in this article:
https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-grants-accelerated-approval-new-treatment-advanced-soft-tissue-sarcoma

As I understand it, isn't the current market size for these drugs $1bn/$2.3bn. If the pre/CISION platform improves the tolerated dose by, say, 5 times (think AS mentioned 20x FOR AVA6000 in last presentation), wouldn't that create the potential for a much larger market for both drugs?

If any of the TP correspondence is true, surely it's a matter (of concern) for Avacta, & the whole diagnostics industry. BlackCat ought to forward the whole lot to the Times/Telegraph/Mail, the various MPs, probably Javid et al.

It's more than a disgrace.......if true.

Marik, Trouble is we all know about manyana. Most of us wait in silent anticipation/expectation/hope as we believe in the mid/long term prospects of the Company. Think we are all frustrated, shareholders & employees alike, so, when contributors regularly forecast 'tomorrow' or 'this/next week' they raise their own credibilty stakes, & on a bb such as this, invite ridicule.
BBN was a strong Avacta advocate & an occasional poster. He is also a Twitter contributor, but he seems to have gone pretty quiet on the Company. May be he believes it will be the rns(s) that will provide the news we all await.
No one has/should have the 'inside track'; insider trading comes to mind. It's just a matter of research, follow the clues (personnel engagements etc), the variety of research papers that are printed (kindly shared on here), the partnerships that are announced & a few other strands.
I think Avacta will be succesful, but a number of contributors bombard this board with repetitive opinion (positive & negative) but very few facts, except those that we already know of. If the releases & presentations are to be believed, we have a good idea of potential here.
Patience is a virtue (but bad for the heart).

Thanks vrmnd & poirot, makes interesting reading. Wonder if AS has political ambitions?!
For info, a link to Reaction's BoD & Advisory Board https://reaction.life/about/

It was diagnostic. My own opinion was that they could not find any development partners, so it faded into the background. https://avacta.com/avacta-rapidly-generates-affimer-binders-zika-virus-diagnostics/
However, now they have developed a diagnostic, zika, & many other such viruses, will be on the agenda.

Agree. With exceptions, plenty of empty barrels on here keen to be heard.

That's just g&t talk. What about Jupiter? Maybe the stars will soon be in alignment!

Ophidian what puzzles me about Medusa is tech transfer. At different times Avacta have alluded to BBI, ABDX, & GAD, but never Medusa. Surely, if they are to be a source of production we (the shareholders) would have been informed by rns that tt had commenced.

Thanks for the heads up.

"Following the identification of subsurface #helium, our #HE1 CEO David Minchin is on route to #Tanzania to support the ongoing drilling operation"
is the tweet, which (to me) suggests this not a scheduled visit. Be surprised if bad news; why a tweet if it was? Think the latest Hannam appraisal is the key.

ndn yr 20:47. There is nothing about avacta to debate, unless there are moral questions around it's science. One either takes a (tentative) positive view on the path the company's on, or doesn't. Debating will not change anything about avacta, but it will cause friction on this bb. The only things that matter about any investment are facts & opportunities (open to it). We get very little in the way of fact on this board.

MrA, I agree, but sure neither of the polar opposites would.

CherryHB, not just the right....Piers Corbyn comes to mind.

https://www.boerse-berlin.com/index.php/Shares?isin=VGG4392T1075
Spread is 38.38% with little volume

Gruffel...18 months?? You're just being silly!

MrA, your 13:58. Absolutely correct, the CS is not fit for purpose. However, reforming it is another matter. Entrenched bureaucratic management, political correctness, & unions will block (or sabotage) the progress any such attempt.

Why? There is no timescale for 'in the coming days', it's undefined. Presumably, it was used because the Approver has their own timescale for actioning which Avacta can't influence. My own experience of public service bodies is that something MAY be dealt with........ eventually.

Wyndrum, ofcourse you could be either right or wrong. Therefore, the line of this debate is pointless as we are ALL speculating, much like discussing a game of football before the match. All the 'ifs' 'ands' 'buts' & 'may be(s)' are a complete waste of time. The game ends, we have a result, & we discuss the game again with 'ifs' 'ands' 'buts' & 'may be(s)'. Obviously pointless, but it fills the need for those who 'know better'.
Have Avacta missed the covid opportunity? If we end up with the best lfd that can be used to test accurately for this & numerous other diseases, the answer must be no. Whether or not we missed THE boat, or A boat, can only be discussed once we have finished the journey. So probably not for a long time. ('in the coming months').

Wyndrum, do You really believe, or do you think the experts believe, that the virus will be eradicated in the short, or long, term? If so, what sort of timeframe do you put on it?

And is it possible a variant or mutation may evolve that could be very contagious &/or difficult to treat?