Member Info for jl5006

Hooky
This should of course be on the front page of every reputable newspaper. Why isn't it - because of censorship by Europhiles.
Adopting the Euro - of course - will be the end game - and ECJ control - worse than a concentration camp. And people still want it - masochists sadists - -
Just like "the Prisoner" - Patrick McGoogan - all brainwashed.
What a wonderful world - even worse than North Korea!

All down to dear Gordon B who said that tenants needed to manage - cos of their human rights etc. Can't understand why it wasn't revoked cos HB non payment of rent bad boys and girls don't vote Tory.

More bad news MPs to get inflation busting rise of 2.7% - for non performance - what a joke!

K
I wish I knew,
MMs seem to be playing games with this stock and others of mine, They have managed to drag the price down on relatively small volumes or no volume at all. But if they are holding stock they want to get rid of then they tempt buyers by reducing the price.
Maybe just that because I have not come across adverse comments that may justify the SP slide.
We shall soon see the results

K
The transaction was a sale and purchase and was a bed and ISA. The RNS discloses this.
So he has not done anything other than say - I think this is a good investment for my ISA - tax free in the future!

Similar comment from the little macaroon - Macron.

Tricky
Teachers have a better understanding of English? Really - there may be exceptions but - in the State system?

UP
Guesses are guesses. Civil servants are obliged to produce estimates - political or theoretical facts -
How long is a piece of string and how deep is a hole
I don't know and nobody else does.
Do you believe what comes out of Gov Office?

Chr
Your choice of course.
Accept the offer £7.82 or sell at £7.93 or just hold.
I sold out @£7.93 because I could not see what Penny were going to do.
Decisions decisions - do what you think is right for you - not the crowd.

JRM is going soft - so says the unreliable BBC - really?
I listened to JRM on the Today programme this morning. No he has not gone soft - he may vote for May's withdrawal agreement should a legally binding time limit be inserted as an addendum to the backstop.
Yes ERG did not want the backstop as it is because it is limitless. bit like the 999 year lease. BUT with a time limit - G Cox AG to ensure? Surely it is a workaround.
If the EU won't budge - then we know they stuffed us up like kipper.
Good day on the SP front - good news on the JR front - no more messages that challenge reason.

DD
fitter and more able than u are likely to be M8. U can only learn - if only you would! Couch & potato beckons - max 35 years.

JR
Enough of you - u are not well!

Snige
What crap!
Have u always had special needs?
I voted for Harold Wilson in my college days. Brainwashed by socialist clap trap. I wish I could have rescinded my vote later - what a stupid thought!
Butcher, Baker, grocer - " I bought these 3 weeks ago - but want to change my mind - want a refund!.
Either you are bonkers - see the first line or you need help . It is you who have problem- can't accept democracy - not good eh?

Fl
easier said than done with the Adrian Edmondson (MP Bastxxrd) types in the EU!

Let me post that again without the SB ref
MPs seem to continue to believe that Cox will return with a time-limit or a unilateral exit mechanism wrapped up in a legally binding codicil or annexe to the Withdrawal Agreement.

But they need to think logically here: the EU leaders have not given Michel Barnier a new mandate, which means that the annexe can’t contradict the Withdrawal Agreement which is very explicit on there being no exit mechanism.

Article 20 of the Irish Protocol in the Withdrawal Agreeement (p.328) is very clear. Either side can notify the other that the backstop is no longer needed. The Joint Committee must meet within six months at ministerial level to discuss and then the Protocol shall cease to apply if “the [European] Union and the United Kingdom decide jointly” it is no longer necessary.

Step forward Steve Barclay, the UK's cheerfully beleaguered Brexit secretary, who has now told the EU that Britain could stomach a legally operational backstop without substantial changes. This is because Mr Barclay believes that the UK's negotiating objectives can be achieved via what one EU source described as "keyhole surgery" – making small tweaks to the Brexit deal using a legal codicil. Those tweaks would effectively transfer the written assurances on the backstop Jean-Claude Juncker gave the Prime Minister in a letter earlier this year into the Withdrawal Agreement.

In laymen's terms this means that the backstop would function as currently planned, with no option for the UK to pull out unilaterally. However, the EU would be bound by the Withdrawal Agreement to work out an alternative in good faith.
Cut & paste error.

And
Telegraph update:
MPs seem to continue to believe that Cox will return with a time-limit or a unilateral exit mechanism wrapped up in a legally binding codicil or annexe to the Withdrawal Agreement.

But they need to think logically here: the EU leaders have not given Michel Barnier a new mandate, which means that the annexe can’t contradict the Withdrawal Agreement which is very explicit on there being no exit mechanism.

Article 20 of the Irish Protocol in the Withdrawal Agreeement (p.328) is very clear. Either side can notify the other that the backstop is no longer needed. The Joint Committee must meet within six months at ministerial level to discuss and then the Protocol shall cease to apply if “the [European] Union and the United Kingdom decide jointly” it is no longer necessary.

Step forward Steve Barclay, the UK's cheerfully beleaguered Brexit secretary, who has now told the EU that Britain could stomach a legally operational backstop without substantial changes. This is because Mr Barclay believes that the UK's negotiating objectives can be achieved via what one EU source described as "keyhole surgery" – making small tweaks to the Brexit deal using a legal codicil. Those tweaks would effectively transfer the written assurances on the backstop Jean-Claude Juncker gave the Prime Minister in a letter earlier this year into the Withdrawal Agreement.

In laymen's terms this means that the backstop would function as currently planned, with no option for the UK to pull out unilaterally. However, the EU would be bound by the Withdrawal Agreement to work out an alternative in good faith.

So why would anybody want that arrangement - or has the membership of the Blind Society now include 500 or so MPs and so many in the HOL.?

What u think Snige?

Snige
That was the EU model! Their way of doing their thing.
If that was a model - then best we are out.
Fxxk austerity - profligacy of the last incumbents - one eyed jacks and tony B Liar - fxxked this country - u are just a John McD axsehole fan - . and you will live to regret - because you will be fxxxed beyond your wildest dreams - and die in poverty. Happy holidays where u r for now.

GB

Jr - strange man - man of many comments - he posts on saga - not happy there and must be even more unhappy on XLM - I'm also unhappy.

Rats of NIMH of course - though there are plenty of rats in France - Nimes

Z

The people didn't fxxup - the HOC is like the rats of nimes - an enclave of putrid runts that fit into a cesspit destined for middle earth.
I say - just me - nobody - she should have called the bluff of the bstards who want to remain - I said before she had found balls - but it seems The Rudder has been taken out of her sails. The list of traitors is now so long that there are barely 100 honourable men in the HOC - I found it hard to identify a dozen women - indeed I may be wrong - HOC has forgotten the film 12 Angry men - 1957 - See you in court - though I expect u will be protected by the EU Court.
We cannot go any lower can we? Yes youth has no knowledge and would put their future through the ballot box into something of which they have not grasped - the nettle - and dock leaves have been decimated by diesel.

Pasty c
sorry could well be a patsy