RE: coming together21 Aug 2018 07:36
Thanks for everyone's input (R_Dunc, NoEasy, BB, others), my summary. Its looking like the stake for the oil service provider will be in a well/or individual oil field say Noa, rather than in the whole OPL226 license/concession. The stake will come from Shorecan's (80%) interest & not from Essar Nigeria's, so it will not dilute EM's 20% stake or actually involve Essar Nigeria. Therefore in practice EM will not have a veto, but the oil service provider however may not wish to proceed without 100% OPL226 stakeholder agreement.
It seems EM want out of their 20% but are not happy with the terms initially offered by Shorecan. So rather than haggle they have decided to use a Trump-like tactic of threatening the 'nuclear option' to try to move the eventual compromise more in their favour. Do they realistically want/think they can get back the whole OPL226 license ? Look at their downside - costly law suits lasting years; Nigerian regulatory issues to go through from scratch; a powerful dispossessed Nigerian billionaire fighting them every inch of the way; finding the funds to fight the legal battle & develop the license. If the EM guys misjudge they can easily end up not just with nothing but nothing plus hefty legal fees. It may cost Shorecan a lot to buy them out but the upside of course is Shorecan would end up with 100% of OPL226 in return.
I think Arthur & Kola make a good impressive negotiating team & they have a good chance of dealing with the EM crisis & moving on with the first well development, but the whole process has been put back by X weeks/months. Frustrating but not terminal.