Haha thank you, I like it when someone just provides any honest response with no ramping etc. I’m not too deep, if I lose it, it was just spare cash anyway, so it won’t impact my day to day life - worth the risk for me!
Have we actually received an RNS that mentions a third party? I know there is loads about Avantgarde and a mystery Italian bank, but so far there is nothing that can be independently verified is there? I’m in deep and all the de rampers here making me a bit worried today.
Could the disagreements be that JB has won the vote and they’ve told GC he has to step down as per the old RNS, and he’s said NO BLOODY WAY, so he had to leave? Set up lovely for a JB GC reunion.
This is so dumb, why would someone be doing blatant criminal activity that everyone can see, when they will clearly be criminally charged. You’re just sad you invested in a dud
This RNS says all I need to know. Yet again the board has failed to provide any alternatives to JB’s proposal. Slating JB constantly is not a plan but it seems to be all they have.
I don’t understand the logic behind the RNS. This is a prime opportunity to put your best foot forwards and outline how the current BoD is going to turn this company around. Instead they’ve gone for a petty approach of trying to pick holes in JB. This to me suggests they have no suggestions to better what JB is proposing, and has made me firmly commit to voting JB.