RE: Court Watching15 Jul 2021 21:53
@Barksy1
good expalnation here of the terms translate to English:
https://alessandrastrazzi.adv.br/processo/processo-concluso-o-que-significa-isso/
a) Conclusions for decision
Interlocutory decision (Article 162, § 2, of the Code of Civil Procedure) or, simply, decision , is the act in which the judge decides on something important in the process, but which is not the final decision, on what was requested by the author. For example: whether or not he will hear a witness
b) Conclusions for judgment
Judgment (Article 162, § 1, of the Code of Civil Procedure) is the act in which the first-degree judge decides on what was requested in the case .
The judgment can be upheld (we say that the plaintiff won the action), partially successful (the plaintiff gained part of what he asked for and lost another part) or unfounded (the plaintiff lost everything he asked for). The sentence may also not decide anything, when we say that there was “ extinction of the case without judgment on the merits ”
c) Conclusions for dispatch
Dispatches (Article 162, § 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure) are mere administrative moves so that the process is correctly forwarded and reaches its end: deciding what was requested. For example: when the judge determines that the plaintiff gives an opinion on the defendant's challenge. Dispatches are not decision-making in nature.
In other words, "conclusions for order" means that the process is with the judge so that he can determine what will be the next administrative movement of the process.
So we are waiting on conclusion for judgement if correct!
Sign In
Follow the stocks
