Member Info for Jemesa

Interesting to see what happens if you apply Japanese candlestick charting techniques to the 10 years and see that this all comes to a head on 29 May... you could be right.

taking a step back to EMH’s 10-year monthly chart which removes daily market-maker manipulation shows a textbook macro cycle—from the 2017 "Shooting Star" retail peak (54p) and 2020 "Hammer" floor (11p), to the 2021 "Three White Soldiers" institutional breakout (82p). Following the wider lithium sector reset, the current 2026 chart has printed solid "Tweezer Bottoms" with extreme candle body compression around the 17.5p–18p range. In technical analysis, this tight compression creates a heavily coiled spring, signaling that the free float has been thoroughly cleansed of weak hands and is structurally primed for an explosive expansion phase ahead of next Friday's critical 29 May AGM.

Before anyone croaks from their dark back passage tunnel - this is just for fun, nothing serious.

You blithering buffoon.

First you mistook a German museum for active mine infrastructure.

But funnier than this you’ve got your basic physics wrong.

The EIA deals with dewatering. Geomet’s pumps will actively suck water out to keep the mine dry, which lowers the local water table across the granite block. They are pulling water out to treat it on the Czech side, so don’t worry they won’t be putting water into your 350 year old museum.

The cross-border model is a mathematical simulation tracking groundwater pressure changes in a shared rock aquifer. It has absolutely nothing to do with old tunnels acting as a drainage pipe.

But thanks for the entertainment. You know nothing!

😂- indeed - looks like those big boys wanted to get in before the long weekend…

I totally get the frustration with comms, but there's another way of looking at this, which is this has so much gravity that it's inevitable, and everyone is seeing shadows based on something that happened in Mexico involving the chinese. This is in the heart of the EU, has 400m in grants, and is doing everything by the book to the highest standards anywhere in the world. It will grind out each permitting box in turn and eventually the market will move from fear to greed, and the rerating will happen - it is inevitable.

Or I could be wrong and the dirty tricks of shadowy men operating to rip of retail investors on AIM will win "again"

You've have managed to prove that you are a total idiot, too good.

I hadn't realised you were talking about a tourist museum, I thought this thread was about a lithium project. Clearly my mistake - perhaps all of your rants have been about the museum, and you should contact them for your money back.

The article you shared explains that the photo was taken during a side-visit to the Zinnwald Mine Museum across the border in Germany to view 17th-century historic workings on display. That underground border stone is a protected museum exhibit, not an operational development.

On this thread all of us are talking about a modern industrial mining project, not a tourist attraction. Sorry if you hadn't realised this, no wonder you are angry with Keith if you invested all that money and didn't have a nice trip to a museum.

Geomet’s actual mining infrastructure—the portal, the access, and the processing plants—are all located 100% inside the Czech Republic. There are absolutely zero physical tunnels crossing the border in Geomet's operational mine plan.

To be clear - the cross-border EIA from the May 6 release is strictly for transboundary hydrological modeling to map how pumping water impacts the shared groundwater tables across the granite block. It is a mathematical water simulation, not a physical tunnel network.

Perhaps that naught engineering team’s afternoon side-visit to a German museum has got your knickers in a twist - who knows.

Happy bank holiday weekend.

The rubidium article is interesting, but the global demand for it would have to increase somewhat for this level of supply to be truly valuable - but interesting to the interest around what's there. Can't hurt the valuation tho'

The troll was last seen ranting about fictional tunnels before disappearing up his own back passage from where he issues utter nonsense daily

While the actual buyout figure is the only factor we're really interested in and everything else is speculation - here's some more speculation:

Very important to distinguish buyout action from permitting (in)action. The latter is slow and predictable, the former can happen anytime. It could happen today... (not a prediction)

But - to kick anything off, it would have to be a proof of funds legally binding offer.

If a legally binding offer to buy the EMH 49% this would simply trigger CEZ's right of first refusal (ROFR) - CEZ just matches.

BUT EMH could also be bought out on the stock exchange - and the ROFR does not apply - to block a takeover here - CEZ would have to launch a public counter-bid and outbid the competitor to win the shareholder vote.

If CEZ just steps up (realising the geopolitical/strategic nature of the asset just keeps increasing) then an independent fair value expert is brought in.

But regardless of the mechanics there remain complex questions that heavily favour a high figure for EMH shares:

The EBRD shares - as many have noted that was a managed handover - millions of shares and the price hardly moved from that 17-18p range - Who purchased all those blocks at 18p? Could this indicate an upstream market offer to bypass the ROFR?

Project funding question - because we know anyone buying EMH is doing so because EMH is not in a position to build a mine, it developed this project and is looking to be bought out at this stage - so if a partner does comes in to fund the mine build, a high valuation on EMH's 49% stake is exactly what's needed to secure project debt...

I am not even sure you price in the 400m grants and recent boost from the EU's brand-new tungsten stockpiling mandate - except to say they cannot be ignored.

There's also the point that CRMs are having their moment right now - in these moments strange things can happen - but every single moving part left to determine points toward a premium price tag - how this will happen is pure speculation, but again - it can happen at any time.

Expect the unexpected.

It maybe a small distinction but I never respond to the troll directly.

I would say tho' that the troll provides entertainment value, the sheer levels of incompetence, bad spelling, ludicrous opinions, comedic stupidity. At times, a welcome distraction from serious concerns. But yes, a nuisance too.

Interesting to speculate. Any serious 3rd party would have to come in fairly high to ensure that CEZ didn't match it. No doubt discussions are happening behind the scenes, and the 29 May AGM would be the natural place for any announcements in this regard.

The troll doesn’t understand how valuations work.

Next the troll will explain tunnels will have to be constructed through 4 EU countries to access it and in any event the Chinese have already built a tunnel and have removed all the tungsten on a side deal with KC that netted KC millions while diluting shareholder a billion percent.

If you disagree that this happened, you should prove it.

Very interesting- thanks for sharing

I guess it is a historic tin and tungsten mine - but hey presto - this move of shortlisting by Germany makes the know byproduct into a critical national security asset - doesn’t just increase the valuation but as Germany is leading this it makes the limited cross-border EIA review an aligned administrative formality - a major valuation tailwind heading into the 29 May AGM.

I’m not sure how many more stats can geopolitically align !!!

It's good to have informed people contributing to this discussion.

The troll seems to have confused the project with a tunnel in the great escape.

Of course, the troll has no document that shows the tunnel goes under the German "border" and needs to creep back where the sun doesn't shine.

It is - how close this project is to real tangible progress - that creates the tension.

Hopefully Keith uses the AGM to focus on clear updates and better communication to shareholders.

I'd love to know more about SYS and it's progress. I invested mostly because Heejae is so aligned with this company and it's been a quiet for a quite a long time. Are things looking up given the SP movement upwards?

Thank you for sharing, and it's quite something to see the size of this project particularly compared to Zinnwald and the engineering drawings etc.

Also noting gsdsitgs post which is very sensible, and also cautious about time frames.

It should be obvious to all that Germany does not have joint ownership of this permitting process and that all we are focused on is a "limited cross-border EIA process" only covering hydrology. Everything else is CZ oversight only.

Further that there is zero cause of concern about this limited scope because the technical work is already finished. Geomet/Zinnwald engaged ERM and DHI to prepare the engineering model that shows that the actual mining is deep and beneath a solid rock barrier that preserves the surface water tables. The science is therefore settled and accepted.

Whatever happens in Germany relates only to a statutory notice period under established convention rules - because CZ MoE published the EIA.

Notable too that AMG bought Zinnwald knowing its commercial permits are years away - not months. The technical foundation is solid, the deposit is immense, and the process is being executed exactly by the law - because that's what guarantees the high price of ESG / EU passported lithium.

All of this shows why EMH is right now such a great prospect for a buyout.

So while this thread has raised an interesting issue of timelines for the limited scope EIA comments under the convention - there's no spanner in the works rather this is a situation that could encourage a buyout now - the only question is what price and given AMG's price, it looks like an interesting negotiation.

This is another interesting area, and I think the short point is all eyes must be on the AGM to get some clarity from Keith on how this will all work.

There are a number of separate but related issues that need to be unpicked.

The most discrete issue is the possibility of a buyout. This can happen at any time, pre-permit, post permit (look at Zinnwald for example), and CEZ won't be too bothered about permitting risk for obvious reasons.

The second issue is the limited EIA scoping on hydrology under the ESPOO convention, and we should expect Keith to provide some sort of update there. It's highly likely that this issue was always understood, but could not be confirmed until the Min of Env published the EIA, and sets the clock for a public hearing within the CRMA framework. So the first thing we should expect is an update on those timings.

Overall, this is all very positive for the project because everything is being done correctly.

Where there is a lack of clarity simply relates to timelines for the cross border time frame to ensure that the jointly prepared hydrology work is signed off. I don't think any of us can be entirely certain of final timelines until we are provided with more information at the AGM.

However, this could all be pre-empted by a buyout offer.

Please note - all my own opinion - no crystal ball or inside knowledge. Just a humble opinion.

At this point - I would very much hope for some clear guidance from our Keith and EMH - communication is, as many have noted, not great causing these forums to spend some time trying to connect dots as best we can.

I agree re alignment - That said, it would be sensible for Keith to send out a high-level corporate briefing this week. A good summary update would clear the air and may get more shareholders on the same page.

Interesting - but I think corrupt is a bit strong.

I agree that this raises some questions around the ethics of the timing but this isn’t a legal issue - it's just a question of a shareholder vote.

Keith knows or has been advised on the law and courts don't run companies - shareholders do - we've been told by the Chairman for some time off-takes are being finalised and he's definitely not allowed to buy cheap shares on the open market. So all he is doing is asking us shareholders to ask for a vote on his incentive package, and the question that this raises for shareholders is does he need one? You know my view on that.

It would of course be different if an offtake and been signed, sealed and delivered - Keith would be under an obligation to disclose that now. But a very close to being finalised agreement can be sitting on Keith's desk and he doesn't need to do anything until after the shareholder vote on his incentive package.

Keith's here to make money - and the fact that he wants to make as much as possible with this incentive tells us a lot about where things are. Ethics aside - yes or no to Keith's personal deal - it's good for all shareholders.

I suspect the stall is to wait for the performance rights to be granted and then the offtake announcement, simply because that way around it benefits management and provides them with a well deserved reward (in their view).

But overall I’m reasonably confident of where things are - because I agree with Lucky that there hasn’t been out of control dilution and Keith and others are well aligned and incentivized to maximize share price.

My only point is Keith doesn’t need further incentive given his 5.7m off shares.

Really interesting - thank you. I don't pretend to understand all of this but it seems clear that you are setting out a case for non dilution to raise the investment needed for EMH.

I don’t know if this is right and I would be interested in your thoughts but the performance rights for Keith and Pavlik that are subject to the May 29 board meeting - triggers when they lock in an offtake agreement for at least 25% of the mine's output.

This looks like they're marking their own homework - and given this looks like a confident prediction that this is what's been negotiated but not announced (yet) - how would that 25% figure fit into your funding model?

With a guaranteed 25% what would this do for a funder or for further grant applications? I just don't think that 25% milestone is a random number, and if this is combined with the existing grants what situation does geomet/emh find itself in?