Member Info for Jbatch

Ownership: Stock Analysis says that insiders, including directors, own 5.16% of the company's shares.

Number of Shares: MET1 has a total of 200.47 million shares.

Calculation: 5.16% of 200.47 million shares is approximately 10.3 million shares.

remember a lot of dilution of shares. I believe this is correct, but sure someone will correct me.

Yep, I was in ZOE when it was HRN and Chill, Still have Chill.

Pretty much on par with everyone else here

Good for you Laura, I managed it twice so far but about 4 times losses about evens. As I said I am no expert as no one else here is. based on mass of new shares hitting the market it collapsed further. Last time that happened, dropped to 10p, today up slightly but massive difference btween buy and sell. So hedging on a fall and holding my money till I see what is happening. Again I am no expert but do not believe will fal below 10.... could be wrong!!!

If we go by previous drops of new shares on the market to day is the last day of falling where it will drop to 12 or slightly under. Would have been happy with 14 but think will drop further and then start the rising tomorrow. Must admit i am ready with money to buy if it does turn today!

By the way Anxiety, have the company announced their findings for the testing of the samples. I noted that you said they had billions of dollars worth of asset in the land. Be nice, but unlikely based on the size of the land. There are certainly billions of dollars worth in the region which companies are already mining and there a nuclear power plant being built close to the land area. We would have a share of those billions, and we would have a customer very close so logistical costs would be lower for sure. Hope you are not citing the fake news....! There is no way they could know. It is just a fun piece of reading only and not to be taken seriously or certainly from a business perspective business stance. Bit like the Daily Star finding a London bus on the moon.... this kind of reading.

Sadly you are correct, Mr. Cautious. I believe this share has great potential, but only when the mist clears, and we really know the value of the assets they hold. This could start to arrive in a week, a month, or even a year. Once they have analysed the Uranium and other minerals quality and content then we will know roughly the value of the asset, until then it is a company with a few plots of land. Though land value rises, it probably can not be built on. Hence, massive rises are rather daft and obviously created by unscrupulous people buying, promoting then selling on the high. Fine art to this, which I could never do properly. Yes, share holdings are being diluted as new shares hit the market so those holding lose value, but if you sell high and buy low i guess you negate a lot of the challenges related ti the dilution as you get more shares each time you buy and have more money to buy larger number of shares when you sell high. guess all down to timing, foillow the graphs and the people in the know... Laura? no-one else seems to have it right so far on thee board.

Sorry if already mentioned. I must admit I invested in HNR, ZOETIC and CHILL and feel a tad 'Frozen' at the moment. I have shares in Chill currently. Just wondering if anyone knows have 'all' the accounts now been registered and are we up to date? If so, does anyone have any background on when CHILL BRANDS will finally drop suspension and start trading?

Sorry Maj not a gambler and only went to Las Vegas and Macau actually, to see the shows, not to gamble, so really have no understanding of what you mean by signs on doors, is this something to do with fake ads?

By the way Maj I am 100% in agreement with you that the campaign is fraudulent and should be banned, but then I also believe shorting, trolling and pumping shares should also be banned, but they are things we have t live with. I would rather see a small, gradual growth over a longer period of time based on thee company not on external factors

A bit simplistic, Maj. You have not included intangible assets. The land asset is one thing. But the value is not in the land, but in the materials held in that land. The Uranium which has been identified and as a rich source is currently being tested. The current value of the company is probably closer to 9-10 however when you talk about oil, mining minerals and even AI companies the value is also in the potential. Though I do understand where you are coming from. I also hear you when you say about the ads, but the majority of people probably would never look at the ads that you believe are the sole reason for a companies price rising and falling (which to be fair is unrealistic, certainly median to long term). I guess time will tell whether you are right or wrong, but certainly your theory it is not looking too strong at the moment. Look at Glencore, BP, Nvidia, BBAI, SOUN, If your theory was correct these companies all be around 2 pence equivalent now. They all have fake ads and are not worth their value based on earnings yet have massive valuations and are in the industries where they are valued on future potential rather than current.

Hit 10 to 12 before but think 14 maybe 12 at a stretch but excellent buying in points. I would assume if it does reach 12 there will be a mass of buying and 20 will be back pretty soon.

Really MAJ. Have you never heard of freedom of choice. The price is doing nothing out of the ordinary. A very large number of shares have hit the market Monday, Tuesday and possibly weds it will fall like last time then it will rise. That is the only fact! I still do not get your agenda? Do you work for the company the puts out these fake media reports. Negative marketing, constantly saying how bad they are to spread the word about them. You are a disgruntled employee? Or just a simple shorter who has lost a lot of money on this share and is trying your hardest to reduce the price. The share has almost reached its lowest point 14.

Absolutely, and I was one at the top price. Probably have a couple of days of falls next week for profit taking and absorb new shares and will probably start rising again, just hope it drops to around 20 but thinks maybe it won't get that far.

Hi all,

I have heard MAST bantered around on other sites. I tried researching but could not find anything to date about the company except raising 5 million in warrants. Have they been sold and entered the market yet? I am more interested in the companies future growth. I read they did some good deals recently, but how good were they and is the company profitable now? Most info. Seems to give data rather than information for this month. Thanks.

Maj, I appreciate your relief that 1 person is daft enough to look at these ads and obviously believe them. But to be fair he may be new to investing so he may have an excuse, it is no dafter than believing the shares will fall to 2p or 3p based on the ads stopping. This company is making business decisions and wisely, they have shown their worth. Now we await the results of the tests on the uranium deposit samples, that and that only will determine the direction of the share price. (go on please give me a laugh I really need one.... come back and say the deposits have no relevance in the share price and only your ads will affect it.... The end is nigh! the end is nigh! Repent!

Artbyav you are feeding the likes of Maj who are right about these fake news sites, I must admit I did not think anyone actually read them, so I apologise to Maj for that. The company will rise based on its findings. It is a strong company for the future, they are doing the right things at the right time. Based on the size of the land I would have thought Billions would be to greater a value but certainly many millions, possibly hundreds of millions. Certainly it would be amazing if they did, but not really realistic. At the moment the company is in research stage which will take some time, they then need to dig the Uranium and other minerals, which is not easy, and they need money for this. To say what price is a crystal ball, so 5 pound is a figure pulled out then had not based on substantive evidence. I would keep away from any media promisionmg massive gains as logically they are doing so without any evidence, even the company does not know so how could the guardianglobe..... who?

Exactly, Going by MJ theory of stock market success you would lump Nvidia, Glencore and Met1 into the same pen because they have all had adverts. However Nvidia is now a trillion-dollar company and Glencore is a billion-pound company. The stock market is not an advertising campaign, though adverts could have a limited effect on certain companies for a very limited amount of time.

Hi MJ was keeping out of your consistant deramping. I must admit I was rather amused at your use of intelligent people suggestimng the only intelligent people are those that support your theory.

1. You claim to have no money invested or shorting the share and never would (it is a tad hard to believe considering how hard you are trying to force the price down. Why would a person so intelligent spend so much time and effort deramping a share if they have no intention of putting money in one way or another? Makes no sense to be honest!

2. You also claim that the only thing that affects a share price is the ads and nothing else.... Again you really see that as intelligent? I understand your theory and people can for a price up, but the share would move constantly up and down wildly. MET1 is rising slowly.... I am not sure really that your ideas are at play here, there is no evidence (maybe when it went to 50, but now??? nope it is acting like a normal share under normal conditions).

3. You state the share price is falling to 2/3 pence. Since June the 11th (we are now on July 7th) MET1 has been on an upward curve with the odd day slightly down a bit but, on the whole, has been on an upward trajectory at a reasonable growth rate, daily. Again, not sure where intelligence comes in suggesting that those investing in MET1 are not intelligent... just saying MJ, you know throwing it out there.

Hope so castle Paul.