Member Info for Janoz316

Look at the legal case they had. It was neccesary to drop that case before entering a supply chain. That is why they dropped it. That was old tech not the new stuff. Say Samsung will not enter into an agreement with a big legal case hanging over CPX. Antony knew that. In a way it got them noticed. They have very good products.

Say Samsung. They are not messing about.

Design win suggests that. They are in the supply chain. That is a big achievement. Means they cann ot fail.

Already been tested by the OEM. Last year.

It's like the same people who follow Zak. Crystal ball types.

I could tell you how to find that out but I won't. Maybe think before you type.

You simply do not understand supply chains or how markets work. I like the fact you think you do, kid.

I think you should qualify that with 'in your opinion'. Trust me you don't have an opinion just babble.

I like another company that Cooley has a stake in. They raised last week, shareholders were obliterated. I like the fact you can get in early. There is opportunity on AIM. But I guess you have to lose it all to make it back in a way.

I think around 26 is in as a base. I don't usually average up but smart people often do. I don't need the money because I am just a simple guy. Someone mentioned FTC on the other board. I think that is a good example of technology moat and the funding that comes with it. That is I think a 300 million mid cap. As we enter the next phase the valuation of what they have and future value will come into play. Serious money can be made here.

That trade went through. I believe it was an exchange. Take that as my opinion.

It's interesting Halliday bought on the open market. I am assuming between 16-24? Schurter also bought much higher and averaged down in the placing, so did Cooley. Why couldn't they get ii in the last placing it seems bizarre. Never understood why.

Maybe AIM isn't for you Onion. This has been rising nicely on good progress, it's a rare gem. Why the negativity? I have bagged so am happy. Have you bagged, I think you aren't far off. That is a great success and it reflects well on the company and your decision. Be happy its the weekend mate.

I have looked at the balance sheet and we aren't losing 'massive amounts of money'. This has already been explained to you. Just sell .

It matters because it could be our buyer who tr1'd earlier increasing his holdings. But I guess you knew that already.

Think you are right maybe he wants 10%. I still think Schurter will add more as well.

Babble

Troll has arrived

A recent EEAS rns. Could this be a link?

Redaptive will provide funding of up to £100m to support Redaptive-approved eEnergy customer projects across all client sectors in the UK, with eEnergy undertaking operational oversight of such projects and bearing responsibility for all warranty and service-related contractual obligations. The partnership establishes eEnergy as one of Redaptive's dedicated delivery partners for Redaptive-initiated projects in the UK.

Redaptive is a leading Energy-as-a-Service provider in the US that rapidly funds and installs energy-saving and energy-generating equipment across its clients' real estate portfolios. Redaptive was founded in 2015, is headquartered in Denver, Colorado, and its clients include T-Mobile, WPT Capital Advisors, Novolex, Cintas, Saint-Gobain, Iron Mountain and many more. To date, Redaptive has completed a number of projects in the UK but is looking to expand coverage.

Those placing shares went somewhere. Schurter don't need to notify as far as I know.