The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from WS Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
Question open to all then!
Let’s hope it’s 30,000 premium names!!
Chance would be a fine thing!
Decent progress but would hope the company thinks twice about more acquisitions unless it has its own cash reserves to achieve this. More dilution is not the answer.
Also, I cannot see how a further acquisition(s) affords investors a dividend in the medium term.
Unlikely to achieve a $10m profit in current financial year unless you sell a good number of premium names and a modest amount of .shopping. Is .shopping like to be a high value / low volume TLD or a modest volume / high value offering? I guess time will tell!
On the face of it yes, but ultimately depends on take up and what somebody is prepared to pay for them. If MMX can significant impact on that front then ICM, as biggest shareholders, would clearly benefit!
There are always shares available to buy but even the smallest quantities purchased at full ask will send the price northwards. Naturally this may flush out sellers but as long as shares continue to be snapped up the SP will rise, particularly if the free float is small. Using this logic, it would be difficult for anybody to build a substantial position without there being a disproportionately positive impact on SP IMO.
I'll say 28p and 11th May. I feel the SP needs to be higher than 25p in order to make the return on the 16p options attractive enough!
Would be ecstatic with 30p! Guess we'll just have to wait and see how this plays out.
.....they are my Stock and Bed ISA transactions. One is clearly a buy!
More interested in the next few days if I'm honest!
Decent, steady progress being made. Can't understand why we appear to have 'pulsed' activity on domain numbers.......short bursts in one specific TLD followed by very little eg .work As .work slows to a trickle, .vip (previously a trickle) now appears to be returning good numbers. Is this coincidence or design?
Most will be Bed and Isa�s. The unusually large spread doesn�t help the cause in identifying what is what!!
They've shown the sells but clearly there must be some buys to follow as the price hasn't moved!! Hoping for a late flurry like yesterday.
Could be investors stock and bedding ISA's in some cases I guess. This being the case one would expect to see some late trades going through on Monday and Tuesday.
Any thoughts on the large trades? Seen a few of these go through over the course of the week and always seem to land when the spread has been adjusted making it difficult to conclude whether they actually buys rather than sells? I note we are still up for the day so unless we're expecting a late buy coming through I would question whether that 250k is a sell.
I had the same but when it must have been a glitch as was referring to January�s trading update.
I'm quietly confident that something positive is afoot. I guess the level of positivity boils down to price achieved per share if it is an outright sale. We have some real quality in the estate......as well as a few dogs! Price should factor in future potential, profitable, cash in the bank etc so a SP north of 22p would be an expectation. 25p+ is more the calling.
Was thinking the very same Sunday. I could be wrong but .shopping pending launch would very much suggest there is a "chinese" connection to the review as oppose to a Western player. Rules out Verisign (Doh!) but there are plenty of big hitters in China........Alibaba, JD etc
Do you think we�ll hear something on / in advance of the 20th April regarding the review? I guess much will depend on when the company reports full year financials. Friday 20th or 27th could hopefully be TLDH Friday on steroids!
Just checked and yes, "Sunrise" starts on 20th April. Unsure as to when this schedule was last updated but have to assume that the 20th April is launch. Can't understand why this wasn't communicated by RNS. I'm sure previous intentions to launch new TLDs were communicated as such.