Member Info for jaf1948

Calling people names is understandable when you are all losing large amounts of money. May I remind this board that I first questioned Masterman’s ability to deliver on this project in 2016 - perhaps it might have been a good idea to have had an open mind rather than keep using the filter button.

Have a good weekend, safety.

No one broke the deal. No deal was ever agreed. Youmade a suggestion and it wasn’t taken up, one of the reasons being that you didn’t agree to stop posting your inaccurate comments.

I have absolutely no problem with anyone posting the same links day after day. If they were accompanied with a comment such as 'When WRES achieves full production at their planned costs, they will be the 3rd lowest cost tungsten produced', I would have no objection either.

On the subject of repetitive posts, who has been saying virtually every friday for the past few years that they wouldn't want to be out of this over the weekend ?

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it."

I believe this was one of Joseph Goebbels's favourite sayings.

stevebt,

'pot kettle' means one person is as bad as the other. It is a fact that WRES is not now and has never been to date the 3rd lowest cost producer of tungsten so therefore the person who keeps posting that is a liar. Therefore you are by implication calling me a liar as well.

Not only can I read, but I also understand logic.

'Confirmed childish'

Is this the same K3VMC who said on 5 November 2021 ' I think it’s good manners to try to avoid playing the man instead of the ball.' ?

Sorry, stevebt, which lie do I keep reposting ?

You just can't help yourself, can you ?

Well, not in WRES anyway.

No

I plead guilty to being the one other person who posts on WRES on ADVFN.

I have just had a count - I have made 3 posts on there in the past 4 months.

I can only speak for myself as I do not know and have never met any of the other posters.

It is not the links alone that are the problem - it is the throwaway comments that go with them, 'the 3rd lowest cost producer' being an obvious example. Are you going to cut those out as well ? You can keep posting the links as far as I'm concerned- they only go to show how far WRES has fallen from its objectives.

And people wonder why there are so many negative posts when Troajan continues to state day after day that WRES is the 3rd lowest cost producer which is not true today, was not true yesterday and in fact has never been true.

Valuation,

Useful does not have to mean positive. If only one of GUG's posts stops someone investing in WRES and losing their money, then that post has provided useful information.

Safety,

'Indeed, what is the point of posting for those not concerned financially with no intention of being so.'

Do you stand outside charity shops and ask the volunteer staff why are they are doing it for nothing ? Do you ask blood donors why they make their contributions for no returns ? It is called 'public service' and uninvested posters on here can be said to be making their own small but valuable contribution to helping the public.

Whatever they're paying you, Troajan, it isn't enough for your dedication to the cause.

Troajan,

I only ask that because I would not want people reading this thinking you might be trying to mislead them.

Troajan,

'LOW COST wise.....wres ranks 3rd lowest'

Can you please show the WRES figures for 2020 and 2021 to support that claim rather than some hypothetical date in the future when they may possible achieve it ?

No, this board is about WRES - it does not state anywhere in the LSE rules that people have to be invested.

However, some people like to use it for the own personal discussions about subjects that have nothing to do with WRES.