Member Info for jackdaw99

I suspect they want it to be marketed. They just want to own it.

.. although give it 5 minutes and someone will pop up to claim it was a sell.

... late buy.

I, for one, have no explanation but it is something that has persuaded myself and some other LTHs that some organisation(s) see value here, even if it might be buried beneath a mass of skulduggery and shady dealings! I'm not usually a conspiracy theorist, but the way this share behaved after NASDAQ IPO (and not before) has been very strange, and I include the FDA decision in that package. So it's something that involves the USA, at least one organisation with market access and some robots to call on, and (of course) a wagonload of paid bashers. I'm not certain that points only one way, but I'm betting it might - remember the Buffet homily about patience - the big organisations are very, very good at it.... and we are not.

I'm investing in truffle-flavoured, non-steroid analgesics. Can't go wrong.

Perhaps because it was an 'indicative' sell but but not in fact a sell? Look at the trades either side...

Correct, and I think it's more accurate to say that the FDA simply want an understanding of any liver problems before they could approve - nothing else held them back. Because the liver is involved in detoxifying pretty much everything that enters your bloodstream, there are millions of things that 'excite' the liver and cause temporary changes in its biochemistry, but that doesn't mean they are long-term dangerous at the right doses. And, even with slight risk, the benefits may easily outweigh the costs. Best case scenario IMO is if someone sees value in a re-application for Iclaprim, not for skin infections, but for lung infections. The process could take a while (or, with the COVID situation, perhaps not too long) and, pending approval, I wouldn't be surprised if the SP bounced around the 20-30p mark, as it used to do back in the day (mind you, it's fluctuations were baffling even then...) As I say, best case ... but it would certainly explain the presence of the basher army .

.... might have been hard to fill. In which case tomorrow might be another day, as Proust once exclaimed.

Why America?? Someone has to.

Yes. I haven't been here very long (you can easily check) and my girlfriend just found 10 million share certificates for MTFB down the back of the pug basket. Can anyone tell me what this company does and what I should do with them? Can I exchange them for stamps at the Post Office?

Methinks this will boom big time when America wakes up DYOR, IMO etc etc

... almost two months ago.

"There was no bear in the first place, mortality rates will prove to be around .1%. Quoting Dr Fauci. His own words, it's no worse than a bad flu season. " Reference?

"There was no bear in the first place, mortality rates will prove to be around .1%. Quoting Dr Fauci. His own words, it's no worse than a bad flu season. " Reference?

... of lows today. And another big buy. Looking good.

No, religious people never do those things....

I suspect he meant it in a good way...

"... one thinks ..." You're Prince Charles aren't you!

Sheltie .. a ramper?? Quite the reverse, or at least realistic, on most occasions.

Correct. It was at least as good as the comparator standard at dealing with skin infections, plus lower hospital costs (as single dose), plus fewer renal problems. The FDA simply wanted more details on the POSSIBILITY of liver damage. If they had been working current standards, they would not accept paracetamol and would probably refuse aspirin on grounds of stomach damage. So NOT really a major clinical setback, but a financial problem for MTFB to be sure. Perhaps they can overcome that soon AND file for a respiratory system antibiotic?