Springer peer review21 May 2020 19:21
Last RNS is a big deal
Just reading up about who Springer are... If you are in the world o medical ect research its a main source to go to.
For most of us it just looks like a place to post your research
Interesting that what the report says we have known via RNS since Yoda ect..
But posting on a trusted reputable platform as they have puts everything out there for the medical wold to pull apart and examine.
It's basically the offial place to say to the science world, 'here is our official findings that we 100% believe in and here is the evidence to date..'
Now of course anyone can post their research but if you are accepted to two world trials as we have and have raised a years worth of dosh to keep going and have very large IIs invested, receiving grants from the finnish govement ecrt.. Ect... Ect...
Then combine that with the calibre or Marku who we read about in the interview earlier... His goals, how disappointed he was two years ago, how he rectified the issues... That determination and devotion and joy he gets from his work plus in such. Underestimated way except for the disire to help people with their illnesses
He wouldn't publish something with holes
This is rock solid evidence... 'we have fixed the problem.. Never did I believe Traumakine wouldn't work.. I have not lost my faith in Traumakine! "
Yes publishing their findindings where they have yesteday is a big deal and soon the markets will realise this