RE: Trump/Tariffs Trade?4 Feb 2025 20:30
@ Johnstoneo. 17.32 post
"""""I spy I also said hole 19 wouldn’t be good which is why Brad was sweeping it under the carpet."""""
Do you have difficulty reading or understanding?
Taken from todays RNS.
Holes PEP019 and PEP020 were both drilled from the same pad in the SE of the mineralised zone to test continuity of mineralisation and to examine some additional structures that had been identified at surface in this location (Figure 3).
Both holes entered broken ground at shallow depth, potentially indicative of a N-S fault that will require more examination. The fault zone, however, was substantially mineralised, with the holes recording high quality intersections of 44.3m @ 1.63g/t Au and 54.65m @ 1.94 g/t Au respectively, both from surface.
Would you say that "substantially mineralised" or "high quality intersections" are not good? What qualifies you to make this statement? Your total ignorance surpasses your investing acumen.
Is what you are actually saying, is that this RNS is mis-leading.
If i have this completely wrong, can you, Johnstoneo, or anyone else who reads this board, tell me what i am not seeing.