Member Info for Intrusivethought

Musings, Nanoco do indeed have a very strong casse. This is why I believe that there is more to the settlement and/or imminent status of the organic business to have cnovinced such a relatively lower settlement offer.

A strong possibility Sammy.

Jesus Christ! OK, i'm out.

How much exactly has the funder invested thus far buzz?

A reminder to all.... DON'T DO DRUGS!

You better sell you holding then.

The company has its fingers in a number of Display pies. Be patient. Working capital is vital and this settlement will provide it.

Notice how Richardson is careful to say SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, not settlement AMOUNT. Honestly... WTF?!

Agreed. Excessive exuberance to excessive pessimism.

Wise words Nig.

Absolutely Gig.

Ah. A bit strong maybe. What I meant was that CFQDs are not generic. Different applications require different materials and processes to manufacture. Nanocos patents in that respect are very significant. Regarding their current generation of dots, they are the best and least toxic available. By resolving the Samsung dispute and thus effectively validating their dots, the quality will eventually out. The major OEMs will want the best performing and most environmentally friendly product... one OEM partucularly so.

?.

kat, I echo your last comment.

NG, GIG, thank you for your sensible and rational posts today. Resolving this now is a good thing. The company are not giving up on display!

2d, EL-QD etc. Stay calm.

Wild claims re share price... not from I Sir. We'll see what transpires.

With respect Bass, that is a myopic view.

Only those patents.

Sensible RNS to manage outcome expectations.