Member Info for Intrusivethought

Yes Nanogeddon, but Nano's case was very strong indeed. It doesn't make sense to me. There must be more at play here.

So much pessimism right now, granted with some justification. But overdone in my opinion.

If lobo87, if. Wait and see what the final settlement outcome is.

Sell then FFS.

If Samsung Display are not a defendant in the US court case, will (can) they be a party in the settlement being overseen by the court?

Yep, it's nonsense.

I'm devastated blitzed.

It's nonsense.

If board members are looking at internet forums, particularly during this period, then God help us all! Wait and see... I'm inclined to believe there is more to this.

Yep, EL-QD is the ultimate, and Nanoco have been working on it for many years.

So many unknowns at the moment.

lol! I love Jerry. I hope we all get our Jerry Beads!

Speculation again, but could there be a separate agreement between Nanoco and Samsung Display in the near future?

by lcd panels i am refering to QLED.

They have nothing to do with the quantum dots being incorporated into LCD panels that Samsung electronics sell. It is for this reason they were dropped from the litigation. They are however the manufacturer of the more recent range of QD-OLED panels.

Easy Nig, no need for that.

It might be nothing, but I remind everyone again that Samsung Display are not a defendant in this court case.

That's my thinking Ecclescake, and not just hopeful thinking when you look at their patents. Super comment.

lol.

What he said. Sage advice.