Member Info for Intrusivethought

We?

?

In all honesty, if the company receive a decent chunk of working capital from this settlement, I'll be ok with that. The truly substantial damages were only going to be obtained by pursuing the global litigation to or near to the very end.

And yet you continue to hold. Bizarre.

True. And still a very large holding. Further trimming of their position will not surprise me.

Sit back and relax. In my opinion, there is a lot more going on in the background.

Are you in profit Nanogeddon?

Leave it Feeks, for your own sake. The professor will do what he does.

Indeed Nanogeddon, such a strong bargaining position. Hence I speculate that something outside of this settlement must be in motion.

I agree that If it was, then yes, the Friday RNS should have detailed.

There goes the financial underpinning then.

Edison are not idiots. Point 5 is.

Edison's comment re point 5 is idiotic.

If you invested on the basis of a litigation outcome, then more fool you.

Yep. Now it's LOAM making the decision to settle. Everything you have suggested is correct FH.

Very unlikely.

I agree. Let's see what actually transpires with the settlement AND the organic business over the next 6 months. Good or bad, the prospects for the business will be clearer.

I've been here a long time FH, and currently still in profit. The company making a profit is the goal, of course. I believe it will.

Hear Hear Nig. This is all about the organic business having a firm foundation to propel it forward. I am not invested here on the basis of a potential bumper damages award... that was always a bonus.

Please also remember that Samsung Display were removed from the litigation at an earlier stage. They were not a defendant in this trial. It is Samsung Display that produces QD-OLED panels.