Member Info for Intrusivethought

They are.

Yes multiple products. Baked beans, tomato soup, spaghetti hoops, ketchup. If heinz can do it why can't Nanoco. I say remove the board and bring in Chemical Ali.... he'll have multiple products in multiple applications in no time.

I suspect. Fact.

And IP not validated.

Ah yes. 26m Tvs sold in the US alone.... £1bn plus outcome to Nanoco.

Indeed Nanonano.

Indeed. The market is always right.

0p incoming. Sell up while you can.

So the IP isn't valid.

It was an excellent outcome, especially when you consider that the IP is not valid.

That's valid. You're welcome.

Nope. I was being facetious. The technology (particularly 2D, which has effectively been validated also) is outstanding. And the various relevant electronics markets are enormous; note ELECTRONICS... not just sensing. When it bites, you will see. I've averaged down. I am confident.

Hmmm...... I wonder which?

Pure hope. Hold tight.

Entirely ignoring next generatio materials and applications. Hey ho.

Https://interestingengineering.com/science/quantum-dot-breakthrough-promises-a-world-of-cheap-sensors

Our materials are very relevant. In particular, 2D materials which exhibit superior performance and avoid the use of toxic elements such as lead, cadium, mercury etc.

Hold tight.

2D materials very relevant for next generation display applications. Samsung Display will want it.

Dub, I believe the 'World Champion' material that the Asian customer gave feedback on is 2D material(s). Only materials I am aware of that exhibit performance that can potentially match or even surpass that of InGaAs, and at orders of magnitude lower cost.

Samsung can manufacture their own dots now, yes. But the best dots?... no. That's Nanoco, and the relevant composition patent has over 10 years lifetime remaining. Surely they will want the best dots in their products, especially the 2nd generation onwards eg QD-OLED etc. Wildly speculative, but I still find it odd that Samsung Display was not a defendant. Samsung display manufacure QD-OLED and will likely also future ranges of products using cad-free dots.

Samsung could use them as second supplier of dots (if they are not already, which I suspect they are, otherwise why build a 50 ton cad-free facility, allegedly). Their licence allows that. Nanosys just wouldn't be able to supply others..... Samsung and Samsung only.

Anyway, 2D nanomaterials for electrincs applications, including dispaly, is going to be a game changer. No other company has the IP to do what Nanoco will be able to do.