Member Info for InJamesweTrust

Redwineday

That's something to take advantage of as far as I'm concerned. Don't think it will last forever

Need actual gas finds to sell Keith before the market prices make any difference here.

Perhaps if work had been done sooner it would matter but it wasn't so it doesn't.

Might buy a few hundred thousand this week to flip after spud if it moves (and the spud is on time).

InTheGo

Don't make anything up.

My interpretation of Jimmy's post was he meant gas testing.

I'll say nothing of what PG has and hasn't achieved from the fund raise narrative below. It should be evident to all.

Always good to read the RNS' IntheGo this is from the one for thenfund raise in July's

· The net proceeds of the Placing will be used for completion of an extended rigless testing programme for MOU-1, MOU-3 and MOU-4, commencement of CNG development studies and tendering for long lead items, residual MOU-4 well costs and general working capital.

Acealfa

I was long gone from HUR before that point. Had sold down some post early oil deliveries and then the remainder when the Warwick drill I think encountered issues or was delayed. Sold before the results. Again, advised at the time I was selling.

Pd72

If you continued to believe Parsons all the way down it's not my lookout.

I'm not emotive doesn't do well to get too attached.

I sold Sound at over 100x the current SP how did you do?

I called this a sell and sold down before the raise. Going into another stock and then buying back here at a reduced price and a reduced holding.

I'm content.

Thankfully PG doesn't remind me of Parsons but does remind me of Robert Trice who also had belligerent founder syndrome.

Let's see what the drill brings.

Pduk and anyone else

Sold in March 2017 for 86.77p just checked contract notes.

So shout about Sou all you wish - I made money as having initially bought in to the stock (but never attended the events) after TE-6 I think i lost confidence it went from 100p down to the 60s in hours if I recall and it confirmed my fears so as it climbed I decided to sell as wasn't waiting for it to hit the pound mark again.

It's somewhat pathetic that it means so much to people but there you go.

I called it down when I sold and again in June 2017 on here.

Graham

You need to get out more.

Whether it was TE4/5/6 I'm not really ar5ed about the nomenclature or Sound energy drills 8/9 years after the fact.

I posted a few weeks ago the time and date ai was calling it down.

Feel free to waste your afternoon looking it or your Sound maps up.

I've better things to do.

Billy Ray - thanks for transcribing it's very good of you to go to the effort.

Smart beds

Having gone in to Sound around the time of TE-4 when tipped in Sunday Times around 35-40p i Exited in the 75-80p region.

I called it down publicly on the board when exiting.

It was a play on Jerry Maguire (In Rod We Trust) not expecting to post for a prolonged period on these boards at the time. So no, I'm not bitter although I do feel for those who lost money on Sound.

happy to leave delays and **** ups in the past and look to results.

others can continue with brickbats or point out where i've been factually incorrect or talked *******s but for now i'm keen to see if they can deliver.

just for clarity - it shouldn't be a forum for abuse but valid questions should be fine to ask.

Great band have seen them in concert FootandMouth but didn't have them down as your era.

Thought that would be more Harry Nilsson - you could earble his biggest hit to GRH while you wait for his missives.

Dickie

There are a couple of CEOs I think are better suited to markets. They blotted their copybook latterly at Tullow but done well at Afentra (Paul & Ian) or some guys I know in senior consulting roles across ops and geology as a team.

The relationships with the Kingdom can be replicated so long as they know drilling is taking place.

There is a need for someone who can negotiate without arguing with his shadow, this will be even more so if the drills are successful and bidders come knocking.

Can imagine PG response for any valuation thesis he doesn't agree with or that questions his assumptions.

Anyway, as I noted below better now to look forward to the drill results and next steps after this and swabbing.

Keith - thank you for showing where Q&A was on IMC dashboard.

For the question about spending the £10m, he gave a rambling answer that the funds weren't raised for testing. Below is what was stated in the RNS at the time.

The Company intends to utilise the majority of the Net Placing Proceeds for MOU-4 well costs and rigless well testing of MOU-1 and MOU-3 and MOU-4.

I'm happy about the near term catalysts but PG has a 2014 chip on his shoulder about markets and can't admit hisnown failures and either can't remember what was said in a previous RNS or answered just as he pleased. I remain of the opinion the company would have performed better under different leadership but I'll draw a line to see what comes from drilling on 23rd Feb and swabbing of MOU-3 simultaneously and ideally it will be a positive outcome.

For the self appointed Oracle as I said to Keith point out my mistaken posts by all means. I wonder if his M&A activity knickers are still flashing red since Q3'23 must be painful.

InTheGo

Don't wish to get bogged down but if you don't have reg approval don't state definitively it will be drilled.

If you want an option on a rig that would usually have a cost. Businesses are not charities.

It goes to comms and openness.

Better to focus on Feb 23rd drill though as let's face it he isn't going to face up to his past failures so let's just hope they are not repeated.

InTheGo

The question to be asked is why the contract wasn't performed. If wr have contracted with the party and pull out we must pay a fee, if they don't perform their obligations then it is on them.

So who didn't perform their obligations - he stated ut would be drilled and it wasn't but still we don't have a reason.

He didn't answer the question about Lonnys departure and if that cost the company money.

He didn't answer the question about how on earth a bonus was signed off in a year where operations were delayed by him taking his eyes off the ball and unnecessary costs incurred.

He didn't answer the question how his contract allows him to be paid extra as a consultant given the already generous salary and bonus.

He didn't answer the question about how much the ECS sandjetting that didn't happen cost in Sept-23.

He didn't answer why there is a one year delay in the revenues in T&T.

He can't seriously say it has been run efficiently with the number of missed deadlines.

However, there is now a contract in place which is positive and hopefully the safety case is complete on MOU-3.

He mentions there being 90bcf of 2C I think in the call which is a good start and hopefully MOU-3 proves up further.

CNG of 3mmcfd won't transform the company neither will T&T production of 1,000 bopd but showing higher amounts of gas will be material and the SP should be underpinned by the CNG potential even at the lower level.

So hopefully onwards to results with a 12 day drill it should be early March so 5 weeks on Wednesday or thereabouts.

From a credibility perspective please feel free to point out anything I've said which is patently false.

Think we are all allowed a life Keith and if it is prioritising my children and their happiness (on this occasion their sports) over listening live to PG, I'll take that same decision every time.

He hasn't answered alot of questions.

For instance, he stated categorically mou-5 would be drilled by May 31st last year but claims not to have paid a penny to star valley for a contract. So what was he going to use, how was he going to drill. It doesn't add up.

Brv

Thanks, that's helpful and good to know this should be organised now to ensure timely drilling

Imagine company is on shaky ground to make the recording private, haven't heard of anything like that before. Seems an odd decision.

Sorry would also say thanks for efforts transcribing.