RE: GAVI conference on Thursday 4th June4 Jun 2020 05:22
Ruck you post this ........
"""As of yet, the robustness of the science is inproven. This is why we need the trials to prove it at which point we may be able to convince some big players."""
"""Debating the theory around the science until we are blue in the face doesn't actually "prove" anything. Otherwise, people far more qualified, knowledgeable and intelligent than us would already be doing so, thus avoiding the need for trials.""
then you qualified it with this ...
For the record, I have never said " human blood work and mouse data" is insignificant, it is of course very significant. Without this, I doubt we would even be contemplating human trials and thus have the chance of producing data that people will not only take notice of but invest significant amounts of dosh.
you are trying to please Knowlesi and the BB at the same time ........
ATB
Knowlesi will not debate the science for the simple reason he cannot ....