Member Info for inanaco

like Building Vaccines ...........

Yes i agree but with Good Data the "market" will be very interested to fund as well ..... and an approach from a Bigger outfit is possible, lets not forget the "New" manufacturing Hub set up by the Government can Handle the Immunobody Plasmids

Us ... lol

I agree ...... The Spot Light is on Use ...... we attack the nucleus ... "the Doomsday Vaccine"

A Reminder
"all about the number you hold"
"Tick Tock"
"on The Cards"
"brilliant Science"
"Binding"

Nice to See Knowlesi Tax's finally been put to good use ...

WoW !! funded ......... exciting now then ...

so no Avidmab deals then ? or TCR ... LL

I think you should appreciate the share rises as the trial progresses and that information is released prior to the end of the trials particular of interest in the step up in dosage being approved ... and the efficacy in phase 1 of the trials (modi1)

Good Post explains plenty Burble ..

got it she is referring to Modi2 .. not Modi1 that was the confusion

are you getting confused with patients blood that did not respond Or actual cancer that did not respond ... ?

whats pan-indication ?

Your EIS shares can be sold here ?

I am with you .... statistical relevance to pass or fail is bull ...

example ... Dr Suzanne Dilly v Lindy Durrant

chalk and cheese ... but the one drags down the statistics for the other .. Rucks Handbook

what was the primary ? if head and Neck .. Modi1

Scib1 does work ...

rewrite the numbers

yes but we read the research papers ........... Trinity for instance puts no value to Avidmab ...

They can act only on information Given .......... then disclaim it any way ....

Under the Criminal Justice Act 1993, dealing in securities on the basis of inside information, that is, information that is not yet publicly known and which would affect the price of the securities if it were made public. It is a criminal offence in the UK.

That is illegal

Plus they will have access to far more information direct from SCLP that none of the rest of PIs may have

Out of Interest Ruck what Qualifications does Trinity Delta have to be even able to assess a potential failure of the Science ???

Only you seem to see failure and yet you don't have any posts that show demonstrable evidence on the subject ... indeed you keep telling me to stick to the science ........

So what we need is a Name in Trinity that can sign off at a level above the Chair of Nottingham Uni ?

or is it the usual Bull ..... ....... A disclaimer that clears them of any liability ...... thus its worthless