Member Info for inanaco

Hi Ruck, we do not need to, understand the science of every drug in development, because we can only trial against current standard of care. So the only winner at any one moment is "the current standard of care" Immunobody works in synergy with it ... I think you have to reason your post way further to generate a risk factor, because in fairness the trial process is transparent, so we can see data on drugs at phase 2 which would indicate a "wow" factor at least 3 years before approval, subject of course to that data maintaining in a big phase 3 trial. Nobody is judging other investments of the individual, but that does not mean we cannot analyse specific data contained in those investments, after all that is what we all do even if you chose other stocks. we have been tracking this area now for years, has something that you have found caught your attention ..? maybe you could let us in on the science. appreciate its all about making money, and even bad stocks can get an unrealistic ramp up.

ONW was trying to bring history in to play ... ie US Funding" what he did was twice used negative undertones Failed .. and bad read it again this time think of it from a negativity point ... rather than a positive. """ none of it's bad ATM not sufficient to spark the SP conflagration """ that statement clearly indicate something bad in there ... """""but not sufficient"" """As I've mentioned in earlier posts it should be remembered that we have failed so far across the pond,"""" when actually we have raised the required funding ... so ONW has this constant need to post negative at the point the SP is falling slightly .... SCLPRE: NewsToday 13:59 Ray i take your point about, "You can argue that the Placing/OO was bad news but I don't think IIs thought this. They filled their boots" Whilst i'd not necessarily be quite as enthusiastic as that maybe you could expand on your point and say why you think we've not had any single entity come forward offering to invest a substantial (and independenly proffered) equity investment if the enthusiasm is of the "filling their boots" nature? I say this as we know that cash raising is far from straightforward or easy in this industry. As I've mentioned in earlier posts it should be remembered that we have failed so far across the pond, and given RG's comments a few months ago I'm a little surprised we've still had to resort to a Placing/ OO given the quality of your listed subsequent news releases. Since you made the point and given your background I'm particularly interested in your own response to this specific part of your post., but I suspect you'll be beaten to the answer from elsewhere :-). BTW thanks for taking the time to list the news items, none of it's bad ATM not sufficient to spark the SP conflagration ATB

we will be fine, don't forget its a UK company with UK direct investors, and its that cash that will be running the trials, and indeed paid for us to get to this point today. we are not foreign owned yet, however just like ARM Holdings they also issued world wide license agreements .... Apple for one , Small company employing very clever people ... got very big ... it does happen.

your posting ... sorry

so basically your claiming that i go personal without any evidence while at the same time posting personal nonsense at me ? how does that work ?

because this is the second time you have come on here posting like this, the last time it was C7 told you to go back to the VAL bb ... so clearly even C7 can see straight through you, and i never got banned from this site for arguing, it was actually for telling a joke that was border line. my history is all there ... 28,000 posts odd, you can trawl through them to prove if i i went personal .. its other parties on the wrong side of the debate that go personal at that point i clearly have the upper hand. the issue you have is you have gone personal so i have the upper hand. rarely does an intellectual need to attack at the personal level, i just ignore it and put it down to success while you go away seething

LOL The hypocrisy of it ...

LOL .. don't you get it ? you came here for an argument go back to your VAL bb ... as from how I is see it, nobody is arguing here .... apart from those that want an argument YOU >>.

evidence """ note we have nearly reached the level of ADVFN BB""" but he never posts and never visits LOL

yea right ....

yes your doing well chap ... how is the VAL bb going for you

poor Ruckrover, but then how could i ever post "selling is good for scancell" and try and get away with it ... Even BShorts picked you up the other day on your "attempted valuation" and explained to you that " never seen it done that way before" i just highlighted how dangerous the post was to even suggest it. if your trying to enhance your status chap ... really this is not the way as your posts on ADFVN would have the majority on here in hysterics ... and that is your problem, how do you conceal your history ?? maybe its best you go back there and edit all your posts ... try "delete"

the interesting thing Roses ... are "you" posting anything worth reading ? and your history surely indicates "scant Evidence" really is a pity that you don't do any research, post articles of interest or add any quality substance to the debates. the reason why the BB is quite is simple ... No negatives ... investors with a clear understanding are patient.

Dominic Grieve does that name ring a bell ... any parallels here twisting one Government Bill into another by clever manipulation

a well thought out post will not attract my attention ... LOL because really over subscribed would indicate you already have your answer ... are you not just confusing the question by making a statement and adding that Ray then answers your statement at the same time .. really ONW ??

exactly Ray at that is what this bb should be promoting .. Hard Facts ... and sticking to the positive, if a negative appears there are posters here, including myself that can reason any science or commercial based question I have no issues with that at all ... but we cannot stand by and let "fantasy" take over when Scancell has achieved so much.

what brings outs idiots ? i will pass that on to Richard .. i asked yesterday of C7 SCLPRE: Frustrating bodThu 20:59 who has promised an update ? after C7 posted """"We have been promised an update end of H1 2018, really looking forward to it.""""" are you not creating "expected news" ?? the problem when you inflate posts you really do run into trouble further down the line. the expected new is the IND ... i clarified that yesterday

This highlights perfectly what you do, now i never beat the drum on this, and let it slide, but you really should think now before you make up all these spurious claims to try and damage my credibility when the evidence is to the contrary. SCLPC718 May '18 """ and do not like being labelled or demonised for honesty especially by somebody who told me to put every penny i had into this at 35p!!!! """" those are your words show any post of mine today the "demonised" traders because your just making up stuff ... to suit what ever game your playing ..

pure sympathy vote ... i suggest you re print any post of mine that attacks you at the personal level you will not find one. yet again your making up stories to suit your position. which flies directly in the face of your posts that really are offensive despite your claims even the other day i asked you to reprint my "hostile post" to you on trading ... you could not but you still made up stories that i had been hostile ... so lets keep it all simple ... stop trying to defend posts that just make no sense and if your chasing pure sentiment driven posters by posting what they want to hear so they feel good, thus it elevates you in the process then carry on

The huge uplift in value comes from Synergy with PD1 ................ simple its the market leader and the current standard of care. with Moditope ........ efficacy, prove that it can smash bulk late stage cancer as promised. then your sitting on Billions of value....... that value can appear at any time ......... even before the trials because the science is disruptive, and Scancell knows what it has. so does all the top scientists in CRUK, isa pharma, genentech, bioNtech so does the US investigators ... all that intelligence backs scancell ... but apparently the Aim investor is smarter ? really